• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用氯化锂进行雾化器校准:一种准确、可重复且用户友好的方法。

Nebulizer calibration using lithium chloride: an accurate, reproducible and user-friendly method.

作者信息

Ward R J, Reid D W, Leonard R F, Johns D P, Walters E H

机构信息

Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1998 Apr;11(4):937-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11040937.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.98.11040937
PMID:9623700
Abstract

Conventional gravimetric (weight loss) calibration of jet nebulizers overestimates their aerosol output by up to 80% due to unaccounted evaporative loss. We examined two methods of measuring true aerosol output from jet nebulizers. A new adaptation of a widely available clinical assay for lithium (determined by flame photometry, LiCl method) was compared to an existing electrochemical method based on fluoride detection (NaF method). The agreement between the two methods and the repeatability of each method were examined. Ten Mefar jet nebulizers were studied using a Mefar MK3 inhalation dosimeter. There was no significant difference between the two methods (p=0.76) with mean aerosol output of the 10 nebulizers being 7.40 mg x s(-1) (SD 1.06; range 5.86-9.36 mg x s(-1)) for the NaF method and 7.27 mg x s(-1) (SD 0.82; range 5.52-8.26 mg x s(-1)) for the LiCl method. The LiCl method had a coefficient of repeatability of 13 mg x s(-1) compared with 3.7 mg x s(-1) for the NaF method. The LiCl method accurately measured true aerosol output and was considerably easier to use. It was also more repeatable, and hence more precise, than the NaF method. Because the LiCl method uses an assay that is routinely available from hospital biochemistry laboratories, it is easy to use and, thus, can readily be adopted by busy respiratory function departments.

摘要

由于未考虑蒸发损失,传统的喷射雾化器重量法(失重法)校准会使其气溶胶输出量高估多达80%。我们研究了两种测量喷射雾化器真实气溶胶输出量的方法。将一种广泛应用的锂临床检测方法(通过火焰光度法测定,LiCl法)的新改进方法与一种基于氟化物检测的现有电化学方法(NaF法)进行了比较。考察了两种方法之间的一致性以及每种方法的重复性。使用Mefar MK3吸入剂量计对10台Mefar喷射雾化器进行了研究。两种方法之间无显著差异(p = 0.76),10台雾化器的平均气溶胶输出量,NaF法为7.40 mg x s(-1)(标准差1.06;范围5.86 - 9.36 mg x s(-1)),LiCl法为7.27 mg x s(-1)(标准差0.82;范围5.52 - 8.26 mg x s(-1))。LiCl法的重复性系数为13 mg x s(-1),而NaF法为3.7 mg x s(-1)。LiCl法能准确测量真实的气溶胶输出量,且使用起来要容易得多。它也比NaF法更具重复性,因此更精确。由于LiCl法使用的检测方法医院生化实验室常规可得,所以易于使用,因此忙碌的呼吸功能科可以很容易地采用。

相似文献

1
Nebulizer calibration using lithium chloride: an accurate, reproducible and user-friendly method.使用氯化锂进行雾化器校准:一种准确、可重复且用户友好的方法。
Eur Respir J. 1998 Apr;11(4):937-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11040937.
2
Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies.
Eur Respir J. 1992 Nov;5(10):1279-82.
3
Measuring nebulizer output. Aerosol production vs gravimetric analysis.测量雾化器输出量。气溶胶产生量与重量分析
Chest. 1997 May;111(5):1361-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.5.1361.
4
A new method for measuring aerosol nebulizer output using radioactive tracers.一种使用放射性示踪剂测量气溶胶雾化器输出量的新方法。
Eur Respir J. 1998 Aug;12(2):467-71. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12020467.
5
Variation in nebulizer aerosol output and weight output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Feb;10(2):452-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10020452.
6
Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.标准化雾化吸入激发试验期间蒸发水损失的重要性。
Chest. 1989 Sep;96(3):505-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.3.505.
7
European Community Respiratory Health Survey calibration project of dosimeter driving pressures.欧洲共同体呼吸健康调查剂量计驱动压力校准项目
Eur Respir J. 2002 Feb;19(2):252-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00224102.
8
Variation in nebulizer output and weight output from Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Oct;10(10):2436-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10102436.
9
Residual gravimetric method to measure nebulizer output.测量雾化器输出量的残余重量法。
J Aerosol Med. 2004 Spring;17(1):63-71. doi: 10.1089/089426804322994479.
10
Jet and ultrasonic nebuliser output: use of a new method for direct measurement of aerosol output.喷射式和超声雾化器输出量:一种直接测量气溶胶输出量的新方法的应用
Thorax. 1990 Oct;45(10):728-32. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.10.728.

引用本文的文献

1
Calibration of bronchial methacholine challenge: addressing dose accuracy and practicality.支气管乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的校准:解决剂量准确性和实用性问题。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2025 Aug 21;12(1):2546678. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2025.2546678. eCollection 2025.