Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中实践组织与心血管危险因素记录之间的关系。

Relationship between practice organization and cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice.

作者信息

van Drenth B B, Hulscher M E, van der Wouden J C, Mokkink H G, Van Weel C, Grol R P

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1054-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research findings suggest that the level of cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice is not yet optimal. Several studies indicate a relation between the organization of cardiovascular disease prevention at practice level and cardiovascular risk factor recording.

AIM

To explore the relation between the organization of cardiovascular disease prevention and risk factor recording in general practice.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data on adherence to selected practice guidelines and on cardiovascular risk factor recording from 95 general practices. Practice guidelines were developed beforehand in a consensus procedure. Adherence was assessed by means of a questionnaire and practice observations. Risk factor recording was assessed by an audit of 50 medical records per practice.

RESULTS

Factor analysis of risk factor recording revealed three dimensions explaining 76% of the variance: recording of health-related behaviour, recording of clinical parameters, and recording of medical background parameters. Adherence to the guideline 'proactively invite patients to attend for assessment of cardiovascular risk' was related to a higher recording level in all three dimensions. Practice characteristics did not show a consistent relationship to the level of risk factor recording.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the presence of a system of proactive invitation was related to the recording of cardiovascular risk factors in medical records in general practice.

摘要

背景

研究结果表明,全科医疗中心血管危险因素的记录水平尚未达到最佳状态。多项研究表明,实践层面心血管疾病预防的组织与心血管危险因素记录之间存在关联。

目的

探讨全科医疗中心血管疾病预防的组织与危险因素记录之间的关系。

方法

采用横断面研究,使用来自95家全科诊所的关于遵循选定实践指南和心血管危险因素记录的数据。实践指南是通过共识程序预先制定的。通过问卷调查和实践观察来评估遵循情况。通过对每家诊所50份病历的审核来评估危险因素记录情况。

结果

危险因素记录的因子分析揭示了三个维度,解释了76%的方差:健康相关行为记录、临床参数记录和医学背景参数记录。遵循“主动邀请患者进行心血管风险评估”这一指南与所有三个维度的更高记录水平相关。实践特征与危险因素记录水平未显示出一致的关系。

结论

本研究表明,主动邀请系统的存在与全科医疗中病历中心血管危险因素的记录相关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Preventive cardiology: what lies ahead?
Prev Med. 1990 Jan;19(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90012-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验