Burdon J, Droszcz W, Jones R, Johnston P R, Trowell S J
Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia.
Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;52(2):85-8.
A multicentre, randomised, open, parallel-group study was performed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and ease of handling of salmeterol xinafoate 50 micrograms twice daily via the Diskus inhaler with terbutaline sulphate 500 micrograms four times daily via the Turbuhaler inhaler. Two hundred and sixty-three patients (aged 18-79 years, baseline FEV1 50-90% predicted, mean PEFR 85% of response to salbutamol) were randomised to treatment with salmeterol (n = 136) or terbutaline (n = 127). A statistically significant difference in favour of salmeterol was seen between treatment groups for the primary efficacy variable, mean morning PEFR (difference in adjusted means 25.4 l/min, p < 0.001). Within the groups randomised to each device, ease of handling assessments favoured the Diskus inhaler over the Turbuhaler inhaler. More patients liked the Diskus inhaler than the Turbuhaler inhaler (98% vs 72%, p < 0.001). The Diskus inhaler received better scores than the Turbuhaler inhaler for all features assessed in the device questionnaire.
开展了一项多中心、随机、开放、平行组研究,以比较每日两次使用都保吸入器吸入50微克昔萘酸沙美特罗与每日四次使用都保吸入器吸入500微克硫酸特布他林的疗效、耐受性及使用便捷性。263例患者(年龄18 - 79岁,基线第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]为预测值的50% - 90%,平均呼气峰流速[PEFR]为沙丁胺醇反应的85%)被随机分为沙美特罗治疗组(n = 136)或特布他林治疗组(n = 127)。对于主要疗效变量平均晨起PEFR,治疗组间可见沙美特罗具有统计学显著优势(校正均值差异为25.4升/分钟,p < 0.001)。在随机分配至每种装置的组内,使用便捷性评估显示都保吸入器优于准纳器。喜欢都保吸入器的患者比例高于准纳器(98%对72%,p < 0.001)。在装置问卷评估的所有特征方面,都保吸入器的得分均高于准纳器。