Aalto E, Havu M, Kotaniemi J, Nieminen P, Svahn T, Svensson M, Valta R
Härmän Hospital, Kangasto, Finland.
Ann Allergy. 1992 Jul;69(1):33-6.
The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of terbutaline Turbuhaler (0.5 mg qid) with that of albuterol chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) inhaler (0.2 mg qid) in middle-aged and elderly patients with obstructive lung disease. The study was performed as an open cross-over (2 x 2 weeks) and randomized study in 85 patients. A significant increase in PEF was seen after inhalation from both devices (P less than .001). Baseline PEF values before inhalation were higher with Turbuhaler than with the CFC inhaler both in the mornings and in the evenings. Fifty-six percent of the patients preferred terbutaline Turbuhaler and 26% albuterol CFC inhaler (P = .004).
本研究的目的是比较特布他林都保(每次0.5毫克,每日四次)与沙丁胺醇氯氟烃(CFC)吸入器(每次0.2毫克,每日四次)对中老年阻塞性肺病患者的疗效。该研究为开放性交叉(2×2周)随机研究,共纳入85例患者。吸入两种装置后,呼气峰流速(PEF)均显著增加(P<0.001)。早晚吸入前,特布他林都保的基线PEF值均高于CFC吸入器。56%的患者更喜欢特布他林都保,26%的患者更喜欢沙丁胺醇CFC吸入器(P=0.004)。