McCluggage W G, Boyd H K, Jones F G, Mayne E E, Bharucha H
Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jun;122(6):545-7.
We describe the cases of two patients who presented with granulocytic sarcoma with mediastinal involvement 15 and 21 months before development of acute myeloid leukemia. In both cases several bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsy specimens, obtained at presentation and subsequently, revealed no evidence of leukemic infiltration. One case was originally misdiagnosed as large-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which resulted in inappropriate therapy. In both cases immunohistochemical staining revealed that tumor cells were positive for leucocyte common antigen but not for conventional B- or T-lymphoid-cell markers. Retrospective analysis revealed that tumor cells in both cases were positive for myeloid markers. Histopathologists should be aware that granulocytic sarcoma may occur in unusual extramedullary sites without evidence of bone marrow involvement. If inappropriate treatment is to be avoided, a diagnosis of granulocytic sarcoma should be considered when hemopoietic tumor cells do not stain with conventional antibodies against B- and T-lymphoid cells. Both histochemical and immunohistochemical staining should be performed in such cases to determine whether the cells are of myeloid lineage. A diagnosis of granulocytic sarcoma is not ruled out when bone marrow biopsy specimens show no evidence of leukemic infiltration.
我们描述了两名患者的病例,他们在急性髓系白血病发生前15个月和21个月出现了伴有纵隔受累的粒细胞肉瘤。在这两个病例中,初次就诊时及随后获取的多份骨髓穿刺物和骨髓活检标本均未显示白血病浸润的证据。其中一例最初被误诊为大细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤,导致了不恰当的治疗。在这两个病例中,免疫组化染色显示肿瘤细胞白细胞共同抗原呈阳性,但传统B或T淋巴细胞标志物呈阴性。回顾性分析显示,两个病例中的肿瘤细胞髓系标志物均呈阳性。组织病理学家应意识到粒细胞肉瘤可能发生在不寻常的髓外部位,而无骨髓受累的证据。为避免不恰当的治疗,当造血肿瘤细胞不能被针对B和T淋巴细胞的传统抗体染色时,应考虑粒细胞肉瘤的诊断。在这种情况下,应同时进行组织化学和免疫组化染色,以确定细胞是否为髓系来源。当骨髓活检标本未显示白血病浸润的证据时,也不能排除粒细胞肉瘤的诊断。