Suppr超能文献

加压包扎对下肢外周及包扎下方皮肤血液灌注的影响。

Compression bandaging effects on lower extremity peripheral and sub-bandage skin blood perfusion.

作者信息

Mayrovitz H N, Delgado M, Smith J

机构信息

Miami Heart Research Institute, Miami Beach, Fl 33140, USA.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1998 Mar;44(3):56-60, 62, 64 passim.

PMID:9626008
Abstract

Laser-Doppler blood perfusion was simultaneously measured on both great toes and the lateral upper-calf before and during fore-foot-to-knee compression bandaging of one test-leg in ten vascularly healthy female volunteers. Two bandaging methods were sequentially used separated by a 30 minutes interval. Bandage A consisted of a layer of zinc impregnated gauze and an elastic wrap; bandage B had the elastic wrap only. Sub-bandage pressures of the test-leg were measured at distal and proximal lateral below-knee standardized sites. The study purpose was to determine the effects of moderate compression pressure achieved for bandages A under and distal to bandaged regions. Initial (mean +/- sem_ sub-bandage pressure achieved for bandages A and B were similar, being respectively 32.9 +/- 2.8 and 28.4 +/- 3.9 mm Hg. Both bandages types were associated with significant reductions in test-leg toe blood perfusion amounting to 44.2 +/- 13.1 percent and 27.5 +/- 10.5 percent for bandages A and B respectively. Contrastingly, test-leg sub-bandage blood perfusion did not differ from its pre-bandage baseline mean level for either bandage type. These findings show that a widely used bandaging method and a slight variant each significantly reduces distal (toe) blood perfusion without reducing sub-bandage skin perfusion. Absence of sub-bandage perfusion decreases may be related to a partially compensating reflex vasodilatory response, but such effects if present are inadequate to prevent reductions in distal perfusion. These results reinforce the need for due care and risk-benefit consideration with respect to therapeutic compression levels.

摘要

在10名血管健康的女性志愿者中,对一条测试腿进行前足至膝盖压迫包扎之前和期间,同时测量双侧大脚趾和小腿外侧上半部分的激光多普勒血流灌注。依次使用两种包扎方法,间隔30分钟。绷带A由一层浸锌纱布和一层弹性绷带组成;绷带B仅由弹性绷带组成。在膝盖以下标准化部位的远端和近端外侧测量测试腿的绷带下压力。本研究的目的是确定绷带A在包扎区域下方和远端所达到的适度压迫压力的效果。绷带A和B最初达到的(平均±标准误)绷带下压力相似,分别为32.9±2.8和28.4±3.9毫米汞柱。两种绷带类型均与测试腿脚趾血流灌注显著减少相关,绷带A和B分别减少了44.2±13.1%和27.5±10.5%。相反,对于任何一种绷带类型,测试腿的绷带下血流灌注与其包扎前的基线平均水平没有差异。这些发现表明,一种广泛使用的包扎方法及其一个轻微变体均能显著减少远端(脚趾)血流灌注,而不减少绷带下皮肤血流灌注。绷带下血流灌注未减少可能与部分代偿性反射性血管舒张反应有关,但即使存在这种效应,也不足以防止远端灌注减少。这些结果强化了在治疗压迫水平方面需要谨慎考虑和权衡风险与益处的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验