• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of four methods for distinguishing Doppler signals from gaseous and particulate emboli.

作者信息

Smith J L, Evans D H, Bell P R, Naylor A R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leicester, England.

出版信息

Stroke. 1998 Jun;29(6):1133-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1133.

DOI:10.1161/01.str.29.6.1133
PMID:9626284
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Many reports in the medical literature have proposed methods of differentiating between gaseous and particulate emboli detected with the use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to compare the previously published methods with our own sample volume length (SVL) parameter to assess the accuracy of each method in classifying emboli.

METHODS

A pure source of gaseous and particulate emboli was obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively, and recorded onto digital audiotape for off-line analysis. In total, 100 gaseous emboli and 215 particulate emboli were analyzed to measure four embolic parameters, namely, embolic duration, embolic velocity, relative signal intensity increase (measured embolic power [MEP]), and SVL of the embolic signal (= Duration x Velocity). Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to assess the optimum threshold for each parameter to differentiate between particulate and gaseous emboli, and levels of sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

Embolic duration and velocity produced the poorest levels of sensitivity and specificity compared with the MEP and SVL parameters. The optimum thresholds for embolic duration and velocity were 35 ms and 1 m/s, respectively, which produced a sensitivity (specificity) of 85.1% (87%) and 87% (67%), respectively. The optimum MEP and SVL thresholds were 30 dB and 12.8 mm, respectively, which produced a sensitivity (specificity) of 86.5% (95%) and 93% (97%), respectively. The SVL and MEP parameters were compared statistically (chi 2) at chosen specificity values of 90%, 95%, 97%, 99%, and 100%, which showed that the SVL sensitivities were statistically greater than MEP sensitivities (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SVL is the best parameter for differentiating between gaseous and particulate emboli but needs to be calculated with the use of a high-temporal-resolution spectral analyzer to measure embolic duration and velocity.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of four methods for distinguishing Doppler signals from gaseous and particulate emboli.
Stroke. 1998 Jun;29(6):1133-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1133.
2
Time domain analysis of embolic signals can be used in place of high-resolution Wigner analysis when classifying gaseous and particulate emboli.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Sep;24(7):989-93. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00107-0.
3
A method to distinguish between gaseous and solid cerebral emboli in patients with prosthetic heart valves.一种区分人工心脏瓣膜患者气态和固态脑栓塞的方法。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.020. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
4
Analysis of the frequency modulation present in Doppler ultrasound signals may allow differentiation between particulate and gaseous cerebral emboli.对多普勒超声信号中存在的频率调制进行分析,可能有助于区分颗粒性和气体性脑栓塞。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23(5):727-34. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00003-3.
5
Distinguishing air from solid emboli using ultrasound: in-vitro study of the effect of Doppler carrier frequency.利用超声鉴别空气与固体栓子:多普勒载波频率效应的体外研究
J Neuroimaging. 2007 Jul;17(3):211-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00107.x.
6
Differentiation between gaseous and formed embolic materials in vivo. Application in prosthetic heart valve patients.
Stroke. 1994 Aug;25(8):1559-63. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.8.1559.
7
Interpretation of embolic phenomena during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术期间栓塞现象的解读
Stroke. 1995 Dec;26(12):2281-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.12.2281.
8
Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system.经颅多普勒能否区分固体和气体微栓子?双频换能器系统的评估。
Stroke. 2005 Aug;36(8):1731-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000173399.20127.b3. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
9
Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model.在体外模型中使用经颅多普勒区分不同病理性脑栓塞物质
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):1-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.1.
10
[Circulating cerebral microembolisms. Detection with transcranial Doppler ultrasound].[循环性脑微栓子。经颅多普勒超声检测]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Apr;31(3):127-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995888.

引用本文的文献

1
An in vitro comparison of embolus differentiation techniques for clinically significant macroemboli: dual-frequency technique versus frequency modulation method.临床上显著大栓子的栓子分化技术的体外比较:双频技术与频率调制方法。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Nov;40(11):2642-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Sep 11.