Schürmann K, Vorwerk D, Uppenkamp R, Klosterhalfen B, Bücker A, Günther R W
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Aachen, Germany.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998 May-Jun;21(3):189-98. doi: 10.1007/s002709900243.
To compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angiography with histology in determining the degree of stent stenosis in an in vivo experiment.
In 16 sheep, a total of 64 stents were implanted into the external iliac arteries. Two stents were inserted on either side. Patency was followed by angiography and IVUS. Four types of stent were used: two Dacron-covered (Cragg Endopro and heparinized Cragg Endopro) and two noncovered (Cragg and Memotherm stents). Eight animals were killed after 1 month, eight others after 6 months. Histological sections were prepared from the stented vessels. Measurements of the patent and total stent diameters determined by IVUS, angiography, and histology were compared.
Correlation between IVUS and angiography was 0.75, between IVUS and histology 0.77, and between angiography and histology 0.85. A mean stent stenosis of 17 +/- 11% (range 0-51%) was found on angiography, of 10 +/- 11% (0-46%) on IVUS, and of 20 +/- 11% (4%-49%) on histology. In comparison with histology, IVUS underestimated the degree of stenosis by 10 +/- 8%, and angiography underestimated it by 3 +/- 6%. Resolution of IVUS was calculated to be about 0.35 mm and that of angiography to be about 0.15 mm.
Under experimental conditions, IVUS was not superior to angiography in determining the degree of stent stenosis in long-segment stenoses of iliac artery stents, when measurements were correlated with histology. Angiography is sufficient for following the patency of iliac artery stents.
在一项体内实验中比较血管内超声(IVUS)、血管造影与组织学检查在确定支架狭窄程度方面的差异。
对16只绵羊的双侧髂外动脉共植入64个支架。血管造影和IVUS用于监测通畅情况。使用了四种类型的支架:两种涤纶覆膜支架(Cragg Endopro和肝素化Cragg Endopro)以及两种非覆膜支架(Cragg和Memotherm支架)。8只动物在1个月后处死,另外8只在6个月后处死。对植入支架的血管制作组织学切片。比较IVUS、血管造影和组织学检查所测定的支架通畅直径和总直径。
IVUS与血管造影之间的相关性为0.75,IVUS与组织学之间为0.77,血管造影与组织学之间为0.85。血管造影显示支架平均狭窄率为17±11%(范围0 - 51%),IVUS为10±11%(0 - 46%),组织学为20±11%(4% - 49%)。与组织学相比,IVUS低估狭窄程度10±8%,血管造影低估3±6%。IVUS的分辨率计算约为0.35mm,血管造影约为0.15mm。
在实验条件下,当测量结果与组织学相关时,在确定髂动脉支架长段狭窄的支架狭窄程度方面,IVUS并不优于血管造影。血管造影足以监测髂动脉支架的通畅情况。