Goldberg T E, Patterson K J, Taqqu Y, Wilder K
Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, Intramural Research Program, NIMH, Neuroscience Center at St Elizabeths, Washington, DC 20032, USA.
Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):665-73. doi: 10.1017/s0033291797006429.
Capacity limitation theories have proved to be surprisingly resilient in characterizing some of the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. However, this perspective has not generally been applied to short-term verbal memory tasks. We explored this issue by first attempting to ascertain if gross misallocations of processing resources might explain impairments in short-term memory in schizophrenia on a classic digit span task and in a second study by attempting to determine what effects delay and memory set size had on a divided attention short-term verbal memory paradigm.
In the first study 16 patients with schizophrenia and 21 normal controls received 40 trials of a three digit task and 20 trials of a six digit span task. As the absolute number of digits presented and duration of presentation in two conditions were identical, subjects thus had equivalent 'opportunities' to make errors if distraction, in the sense of misallocation of cognitive resources, were at the root of poor performance. In the second study 15 patients with schizophrenia and 15 normal controls were tested in conditions in which two, four or six words were presented and in which rehearsal was prevented by an interference task (colour naming) for delays of 5, 10 or 15 s.
Patients had disproportionate difficulty on the six digit rather than the three digit condition, suggesting that deficits in the verbal working memory short-term store may not be the result of attentional factors. In the second study, patients' performance was differentially worsened by the interference task, by memory set size (i.e. a capacity limitation) and by delay, a measure of decay rate.
In concert, these studies demonstrate that schizophrenia patients have difficulties on verbal short-term memory span tasks not because of misallocation of resources, but rather because of limitations in 'representational capacity' and maintenance of information over delays.
能力限制理论在描述精神分裂症的一些认知缺陷方面表现出了惊人的韧性。然而,这一观点尚未普遍应用于短期言语记忆任务。我们通过首先试图确定处理资源的严重错误分配是否可以解释精神分裂症患者在经典数字广度任务中的短期记忆损伤来探讨这个问题,并在第二项研究中试图确定延迟和记忆集大小对分心注意短期言语记忆范式有何影响。
在第一项研究中,16名精神分裂症患者和21名正常对照者接受了40次三位数任务试验和20次六位数广度任务试验。由于两种条件下呈现的数字绝对数量和呈现持续时间相同,因此,如果认知资源的错误分配导致的分心是表现不佳的根源,那么受试者就有同等的“犯错机会”。在第二项研究中,15名精神分裂症患者和15名正常对照者在呈现两个、四个或六个单词的条件下进行测试,并且通过干扰任务(颜色命名)防止复述,延迟时间为5、10或15秒。
患者在六位数条件下比在三位数条件下有不成比例的困难,这表明言语工作记忆短期存储中的缺陷可能不是注意力因素的结果。在第二项研究中,干扰任务、记忆集大小(即能力限制)和延迟(一种衰退率测量)使患者的表现有不同程度的恶化。
这些研究共同表明,精神分裂症患者在言语短期记忆广度任务上存在困难,不是因为资源的错误分配,而是因为“表征能力”的限制以及信息在延迟期间的维持。