• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年高血压患者每日一次低剂量非洛地平缓释片单药治疗:对动态血压和生活质量的影响。

Low dosages of felodipine ER once daily as monotherapy in elderly hypertensive patients: effect on ambulatory blood pressure and quality of life.

作者信息

van Ree J W, van der Pol G A

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10(9):613-8.

PMID:8953207
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the efficacy of 24-h ambulatory and casual blood pressure (BP) reduction, and the tolerability of once daily felodipine extended release (ER) 2.5 mg and felodipine ER 5 mg as monotherapy.

DESIGN

Randomised, double-blind placebo controlled 6 weeks parallel study.

SETTING

From 15 general practices centres (with 19 GPs) in the region of the University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

A total of 129 subjects aged 50-80 years with primary hypertension were screened; 27 men and 61 women with a casual diastolic BP of 100-115 mm Hg and/or a systolic BP of less than 200 mm Hg entered the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Casual and 24-h ambulatory BP and a subjective symptom assessment (SSA) questionnaire after 6 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

After correlation for placebo response the mean casual systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) reduction was 10/5 mm Hg (NS) and 12/10 mm Hg (P < 0.05) for felodipine ER 2.5 and 5 mg, respectively. By using 24-h ambulatory BP measurements these reduction were 6/4 mm Hg (NS) and 13/8 mm Hg (P < 0.05), respectively. No significant difference for SBP and DBP was found during the night time between felodipine 2.5 and placebo (-1/0). Felodipine ER 5 mg lowered the BP load significantly during both daytime and night time but felodipine ER 2.5 mg only for DBP during the daytime. There was a significant difference for the number of responders between placebo (28%) vs felodipine ER 2.5 mg (55%) and ER 5.0 mg (59%). Both felodipine dosages and placebo were comparable in (a low) number of adverse events and results of the SSA.

CONCLUSIONS

During daytime felodipine ER 2.5 mg and 5 mg are effective in BP lowering in elderly hypertensive patients. However, only felodipine ER mg is effective in reducing BP during night time (22.00-7.00). Only felodipine ER 5 mg has a significant reducing effect on BP load during day and night time. Both felodipine ER 2.5 and ER 5.0 have a significant effect on the responder rate. It appeared from this study that compared to placebo, and in contrast with felodipine ER 5 mg, the ER form of felodipine 2.5 mg has no BP lowering effect during night time in elderly patients. To assess the effectivity during night time of felodipine ER 2.5 mg in an individual patient it is recommendable to measure the BP at the end of the dose interval.

摘要

目的

确定24小时动态血压和偶测血压降低的疗效,以及每日一次服用2.5毫克非洛地平缓释片(ER)和5毫克非洛地平ER作为单一疗法的耐受性。

设计

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的6周平行研究。

地点

来自荷兰马斯特里赫特大学地区的15个全科医疗中心(有19名全科医生)。

受试者

共筛选了129名年龄在50 - 80岁的原发性高血压患者;27名男性和61名女性,其偶测舒张压为100 - 115毫米汞柱和/或收缩压低于200毫米汞柱,进入研究。

主要观察指标

治疗6周后的偶测和24小时动态血压以及主观症状评估(SSA)问卷。

结果

校正安慰剂反应后,2.5毫克和5毫克非洛地平ER的偶测收缩压/舒张压(SBP/DBP)平均降低分别为10/5毫米汞柱(无统计学意义)和12/10毫米汞柱(P < 0.05)。通过24小时动态血压测量,这些降低分别为6/4毫米汞柱(无统计学意义)和13/8毫米汞柱(P < 0.05)。非洛地平2.5毫克与安慰剂在夜间SBP和DBP方面无显著差异(-1/0)。非洛地平ER 5毫克在白天和夜间均显著降低血压负荷,但非洛地平ER 2.5毫克仅在白天降低DBP。安慰剂(28%)与非洛地平ER 2.5毫克(55%)和ER 5.0毫克(59%)之间的有效应答者数量存在显著差异。两种非洛地平剂量组和安慰剂组在不良事件数量和SSA结果方面具有可比性(均较低)。

结论

白天,2.5毫克和5毫克非洛地平ER对老年高血压患者降低血压有效。然而,仅非洛地平ER 5毫克在夜间(22:00 - 7:00)降低血压有效。仅非洛地平ER 5毫克在白天和夜间对血压负荷有显著降低作用。非洛地平ER 2.5和ER 5.0对有效应答率均有显著影响。从本研究来看,与安慰剂相比,且与非洛地平ER 5毫克不同,2.5毫克非洛地平ER剂型对老年患者夜间无降压作用。为评估个体患者中非洛地平ER 2.5毫克在夜间的有效性,建议在剂量间隔结束时测量血压。

相似文献

1
Low dosages of felodipine ER once daily as monotherapy in elderly hypertensive patients: effect on ambulatory blood pressure and quality of life.老年高血压患者每日一次低剂量非洛地平缓释片单药治疗:对动态血压和生活质量的影响。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10(9):613-8.
2
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
3
A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release results of the Metoprolol Succinate-Felodipine Antihypertension Combination Trial (M-FACT).美托洛尔琥珀酸盐缓释片与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的析因研究——美托洛尔琥珀酸盐-非洛地平抗高血压联合试验(M-FACT)结果
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Apr;19(4):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.007.
4
Office and ambulatory blood pressure: a comparison between amlodipine and felodipine ER. Danish Multicentre Group.诊室血压与动态血压:氨氯地平和缓释非洛地平的比较。丹麦多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Aug;9(8):611-6.
5
Felodipine extended release versus conventional diuretic therapy for the treatment of systolic hypertension in elderly patients. The National Trial Group.非洛地平缓释片与传统利尿剂疗法治疗老年患者收缩期高血压的比较。国家试验组。
Clin Invest Med. 1998 Jun;21(3):142-50.
6
Randomised, double-blind, parallel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦钾与非洛地平缓释片治疗老年轻、中度高血压的疗效及安全性对比的随机双盲平行研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Sep;9(9):765-71.
7
Efficacy of low felodipine dose monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.低剂量非洛地平单药治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效:诊室血压与动态血压监测的比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10 Suppl 3:S153-6.
8
Comparative effects of amlodipine and felodipine ER on office and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Danish Multicentre Group.氨氯地平和非洛地平缓释片对轻至中度高血压患者诊室血压和动态血压的比较效应。丹麦多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Mar;9 Suppl 1:S25-8.
9
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
10
Felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet: maintained health-related quality of life in the presence of substantial blood pressure reduction.非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂:在显著降低血压的情况下维持与健康相关的生活质量。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 Oct;18(10):1313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.04.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Time course for blood pressure lowering of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂降低血压的时间进程。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 31;2014(8):CD010052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010052.pub2.
2
Smooth blood pressure control obtained with extended-release felodipine in elderly patients with hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.老年高血压患者使用缓释非洛地平实现血压平稳控制:通过24小时动态血压监测进行评估
Drugs Aging. 2002;19(7):541-51. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200219070-00007.
3
Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.
高血压患者健康相关生活质量的测量:随机对照药物试验综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):435-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00003.