Rouwmaat P H, Everaert D, Stappaerts K H, Aufdemkampe G
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Care, Polytechnic of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jun;21(5):327-32.
To assess the intra- and interexaminer agreement of a manual skinfold thickness test and a manual skinfold compliance test. The relation between the weekly routine of the examiners and the intraexaminer reliability was also assessed for both tests.
This is a reliability study of a common palpatory procedure to assess skinfold thickness and skinfold compliance. Twelve healthy subjects were palpated twice in two sessions by 12 examiners.
The study was conducted at the Polytechnic of Utrecht (the Netherlands), Faculty of Health Care, Department of Physiotherapy.
Healthy male subjects recruited from students of the Polytechnic of Utrecht (the Netherlands), Department of Physiotherapy.
The intraexaminer agreement Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC(3.1)] was .25 for skinfold thickness and .28 for skinfold compliance. The interexaminer agreement [ICC(2,1)] ranged from .01 to .24. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the examiners age and routine vs. intraexaminer agreement ranged from -.41 to .23 (nonsignificant).
The intra- and interexaminer agreement of the manual skinfold test produced poor-to-fair reliability. The correlation between the examiners' weekly routine and the intraexaminer reliability ranged from low negative to little (if any). This study shows a lack of reliability of palpatory tests for skinfold thickness and skinfold compliance. This outcome agrees with results of previous studies found in the literature.
评估手动皮褶厚度测试和手动皮褶顺应性测试在检查者内部和检查者之间的一致性。同时还评估了这两项测试中检查者的每周工作常规与检查者内部可靠性之间的关系。
这是一项关于评估皮褶厚度和皮褶顺应性的常见触诊程序的可靠性研究。12名检查者对12名健康受试者在两个时间段内各进行两次触诊。
该研究在荷兰乌得勒支理工大学医疗保健学院物理治疗系进行。
从荷兰乌得勒支理工大学物理治疗系的学生中招募的健康男性受试者。
检查者内部一致性组内相关系数[ICC(3.1)],皮褶厚度为0.25,皮褶顺应性为0.28。检查者之间的一致性[ICC(2,1)]范围为0.01至0.24。检查者年龄和工作常规与检查者内部一致性之间的Pearson相关系数范围为-0.41至0.23(无统计学意义)。
手动皮褶测试在检查者内部和检查者之间的一致性产生了较差到一般的可靠性。检查者的每周工作常规与检查者内部可靠性之间的相关性范围从低负相关到几乎没有(如果有的话)。本研究表明皮褶厚度和皮褶顺应性的触诊测试缺乏可靠性。这一结果与文献中先前研究的结果一致。