Gouttebarge Vincent, Wind Haije, Kuijer P Paul, Sluiter Judith K, Frings-Dresen Monique H
Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Oct;87(10):1365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028.
To assess interrater reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain (LBP).
Within-subjects design, with 2 repeated measurements.
Academic medical center in The Netherlands.
Twenty-four subjects (10 men, 14 women) with LBP.
Not applicable.
Five Ergo-Kit lifting tests (2 isometric, 3 dynamic) were assessed on 2 occasions (t1, t2), by 2 different raters (R1, R2). The interval between the test sessions was 3 days. Interrater reliability level was expressed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the level of agreement between raters with the standard error (SE) of measurement.
ICCs means (reliability) of isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests ranged from .94 to .97, and SE of measurement values (agreement) ranged from 1.9 to 8.6 kg.
There was good reliability and agreement between raters of the isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests in subjects with LBP, which supports the use of these tests to assess functional lifting capacity.
评估5项Ergo-Kit功能能力评估提举测试在腰痛（LBP）患者中的评分者间信度及一致性。
受试者内设计，进行2次重复测量。
荷兰的学术医学中心。
24名患有LBP的受试者（10名男性，14名女性）。
不适用。
由2名不同的评分者（R1、R2）在2个时间点（t1、t2）对5项Ergo-Kit提举测试（2项等长测试，3项动态测试）进行评估。测试 sessions之间的间隔为3天。评分者间信度水平用组内相关系数（ICC）表示，评分者之间的一致性水平用测量标准误（SE）表示。
等长和动态Ergo-Kit提举测试的ICC均值（信度）范围为0.94至0.97，测量值的SE（一致性）范围为1.9至8.6千克。
LBP患者等长和动态Ergo-Kit提举测试的评分者之间具有良好的信度和一致性，这支持使用这些测试来评估功能性提举能力。
