James W H
Galton Laboratory, University College London, U.K.
J Theor Biol. 1998 May 7;192(1):113-6. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0649.
Some comments are made on two hypotheses on the variation of mammalian sex ratios (proportions male) at birth viz. Krackow's developmental asynchrony hypothesis and my parental hormone hypothesis. It seems not unfair to characterise his hypothesis as functioning to support the conventional Mendelian paradigm. In contrast, if my hypothesis were true, some adjustment would have to be made to that paradigm. Here I suggest further ways of testing Krackow's hypothesis experimentally. In contrast, my own hypothesis seems to lend itself also to testing by epidemiological methods; here it is suggested that the offspring sex ratios of several specified categories of ill men should be low.
针对关于哺乳动物出生时性别比例(雄性比例)变化的两种假说,即克拉科夫的发育异步假说和我的亲代激素假说,做了一些评论。将他的假说描述为旨在支持传统孟德尔范式似乎并非不公。相比之下,如果我的假说成立,就必须对该范式进行一些调整。在此,我提出了通过实验进一步检验克拉科夫假说的方法。相比之下,我自己的假说似乎也适用于通过流行病学方法进行检验;在此建议,几类特定患病男性的后代性别比例应该较低。