Suppr超能文献

[初次创伤性肩关节前脱位后的外展/外旋固定:哪些矫形器适用?]

[Abduction/external rotation immobilization after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: which ortheses are suitable?].

作者信息

Thierbach A, Le D A, Uecker T, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M

机构信息

Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie (CMSC), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus-Virchow und Campus Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2014 Dec;117(12):1112-7. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2479-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immobilization of the shoulder in 60 ° external rotation and 30 ° abduction after primary anterior shoulder dislocation has been shown to allow anatomical reduction and potential healing of the capsule-labrum complex. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate commercially available shoulder braces concerning functionality and comfort as well as for potential problems.

METHODS

In this study ten healthy subjects (6 female, 4 male and average age 23 years) tested four braces: 1. Omo Immobil (Ottobock), 2. Quadrat (DJO Global), 3. MP Airplane Axilla (Horst Rattenhuber GmbH) and 4. ARC XR (Bledsoe Brace Systems) with respect to functionality and comfort. Each subject completed simulated activities of daily living (ADLs) and a the end of each ADL the subject evaluated comfort, difficulty of the activities and potential pain on a points scale. The position or the change of the position were controlled by digital photographs. Additionally it was checked whether the subjects could actively change the position of the brace contrary to the desired position.

RESULTS

Braces 3 and 4 were rated significantly more comfortable (p < 0.05). Even the difficulty of the activities was rated lower and in particular putting on and taking off the braces was assessed to be significantly easier in comparison to braces 1 and 2. In addition, differences of potential pain were statistically significant and pain was experienced only with braces 1 and 2. The measuring of the position showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). For braces 1 and 2 the active change of the position by subjects was significantly higher and the arm could be rotated more against the favored position (p < 0.05). Between braces 3 and 4, there were no statistical differences during the whole evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ortheses where the main joint is positioned in and not in front of the axilla or which can ensure a jointless stabilization of the shoulder or which allow an improved position by an additional sling on the opposite shoulder, are most qualified for immobilization of the shoulder in an external rotation/abduction position with respect to functionality and comfort.

摘要

背景

初次前肩脱位后将肩部固定于外旋60°和外展30°已被证明可实现解剖复位并使关节盂唇复合体实现潜在愈合。本研究的目的是评估市售肩部支具的功能、舒适度以及潜在问题。

方法

在本研究中,10名健康受试者(6名女性,4名男性,平均年龄23岁)测试了四种支具:1. Omo Immobil(奥托博克),2. Quadrat(DJ0全球公司),3. MP Airplane Axilla(霍斯特·拉滕胡伯有限公司)和4. ARC XR(布莱索支具系统公司),评估其功能和舒适度。每位受试者完成模拟日常生活活动(ADL),在每项ADL结束时,受试者按评分量表评估舒适度、活动难度和潜在疼痛。通过数码照片控制位置或位置变化。此外,检查受试者是否能主动将支具位置改变为与期望位置相反的位置。

结果

支具3和4的舒适度评分显著更高(p<0.05)。与支具1和2相比,活动难度评分也更低,尤其是穿戴和取下支具被评估为明显更容易。此外,潜在疼痛的差异具有统计学意义,仅在使用支具1和2时出现疼痛。位置测量无显著差异(p>0.05)。对于支具1和2,受试者主动改变位置的情况显著更多,手臂可以更多地向与偏好位置相反的方向旋转(p<0.05)。在整个评估过程中,支具3和4之间无统计学差异。

结论

就功能和舒适度而言,主要关节位于腋窝内而非腋窝前方、能确保肩部无关节稳定或通过对侧肩部的额外吊带改善位置的矫形器,最适合将肩部固定在外旋/外展位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验