Oden Z M, Selvitelli D M, Hayes W C, Myers E R
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Calcif Tissue Int. 1998 Jul;63(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s002239900491.
The objective of this study was to determine the influence of structural organization on the relationship between clinically assessed bone mineral density (BMD) and strength of trabecular bone. Accurate assessment of bone strength or fracture risk is a critical need as the population ages and the incidence of fractures increases. While ex vivo tests have demonstrated that BMD measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) correlates with failure load of whole bones, it is also known that the strength of trabecular bone cannot be explained by density alone. Cylindrical cores of bovine trabecular bone, harvested in a variety of orientations, were scanned with DXA to determine density, assessed with micro-MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) to measure orientation, and then loaded them to failure in bending. Measures of trabecular architecture included the angle between the specimen longitudinal (Z) axis and the principal material axis, the maximum mean intercept length (MILmax), the mean intercept length in the specimen primary axis (MILz), the degree of anisotropy, and the ratio between MILz and the length of the principal material axis. MILz was strongly associated with failure stress (r2 = 0.85, P < 0.001). BMD was also moderately associated with failure stress (r2 = 0.44, P = 0.004). Using a stepwise linear multiple regression analysis, the strongest predictor of failure stress was a combination of BMD, angle, and MILz (R2 = 0.91). When only longitudinal specimens were analyzed, the strongest predictor of failure stress was a combination of BMD and angle (R2 = 0.95). Therefore, trabecular orientation plays a significant and important role in failure of trabecular bone. Accounting for this may improve the associations between DXA-based density measures and patient fractures.
本研究的目的是确定结构组织对临床评估的骨矿物质密度(BMD)与小梁骨强度之间关系的影响。随着人口老龄化和骨折发生率的增加,准确评估骨强度或骨折风险成为一项迫切需求。虽然体外测试表明,用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量的BMD与全骨的破坏载荷相关,但众所周知,小梁骨的强度不能仅由密度来解释。采集不同取向的牛小梁骨圆柱形芯,用DXA扫描以确定密度,用显微磁共振成像(MRI)评估以测量取向,然后对其进行弯曲加载直至破坏。小梁结构的测量指标包括标本纵轴(Z轴)与主材料轴之间的夹角、最大平均截距长度(MILmax)、标本主轴方向的平均截距长度(MILz)、各向异性程度以及MILz与主材料轴长度的比值。MILz与破坏应力密切相关(r2 = 0.85,P < 0.001)。BMD与破坏应力也呈中度相关(r2 = 0.44,P = 0.004)。通过逐步线性多元回归分析,破坏应力的最强预测因子是BMD、角度和MILz的组合(R2 = 0.91)。当仅分析纵向标本时,破坏应力的最强预测因子是BMD和角度的组合(R2 = 0.95)。因此,小梁取向在小梁骨破坏中起着重要作用。考虑这一点可能会改善基于DXA的密度测量与患者骨折之间的相关性。