Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Aug;34(2):361-71. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22612.
To characterize the DDIF (Decay due to Diffusion in the Internal Field) method using intact animal trabecular bone specimens of varying trabecular structure and porosity, under ex vivo conditions closely resembling in vivo physiological conditions. The DDIF method provides a diffusion contrast which is related to the surface-to-volume ratio of the porous structure of bones. DDIF has previously been used successfully to study marrow-free trabecular bone, but the DDIF contrast hitherto had not been tested in intact specimens containing marrow and surrounded by soft tissue.
DDIF imaging was implemented on a 4.7 Tesla (T) small-bore, horizontal, animal scanner. Ex vivo results on fresh bone specimens containing marrow were obtained at body temperature. Control measurements were carried out in surrounding tissue and saline.
Significant DDIF effect was observed for trabecular bone samples, while it was considerably smaller for soft tissue outside the bone and for lipids. Additionally, significant differences were observed between specimens of different trabecular structure.
The DDIF contrast is feasible despite the reduction of the diffusion constant and of T(1) in such conditions, increasing our confidence that DDIF imaging in vivo may be clinically viable for bone characterization.
使用不同小梁结构和孔隙率的完整动物小梁骨标本,在体外条件下,尽可能地模拟体内生理条件,对 DDIF(内场扩散衰减)方法进行特征描述。DDIF 方法提供了一种扩散对比,与骨骼多孔结构的表面积与体积比有关。DDIF 先前已成功用于研究无骨髓小梁骨,但完整标本中含有骨髓且被软组织包围的情况下,DDIF 对比尚未经过测试。
在 4.7T(特斯拉)小口径、水平、动物扫描仪上实施 DDIF 成像。在体温下,对含有骨髓的新鲜骨标本进行体外实验。在周围组织和盐水中进行对照测量。
小梁骨样本观察到明显的 DDIF 效应,而骨外软组织和脂质的 DDIF 效应则小得多。此外,不同小梁结构的标本之间也观察到显著差异。
尽管在这种情况下扩散常数和 T1(纵向弛豫时间)降低,DDIF 对比仍然可行,这增加了我们的信心,即 DDIF 成像在体内进行骨特征描述可能具有临床可行性。