Pearce K A, Furberg C D, Psaty B M, Kirk J
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27012, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 1998 May;11(5):618-29. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00488-3.
The goal of this study was to compare the direct costs associated with the prescription of thiazide diuretics, beta-receptor blockers (beta-blockers), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), a-receptor blockers (alpha-blockers), and calcium channel blockers (CCB) for the prevention of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and premature death in uncomplicated hypertension. We performed a cost-minimization analysis based on numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) derived from the metaanalysis of 15 major clinical trials of hypertension treatment, and the average wholesale prices of both the most commonly prescribed and the least expensive drugs in each class. The inclusion criteria for clinical trials were that they be randomized, controlled trials of drug therapy of uncomplicated mild-to-moderate hypertension with stroke, MI, or death as endpoints. The wholesale drug costs and the total direct outpatient treatment costs to prevent a stroke, MI or death among middle-aged and elderly hypertensives were our outcome measures. The estimated wholesale drug acquisition cost to prevent one major event (MI or stroke or death) ranged from $4730 to $346,236 among middle-aged patients, and from $1595 to $116,754 in the elderly; generic diuretic or beta-blocker therapy was more economical than treatment with an ACEI, alpha-blocker, or CCB. The associated 5-year NNT was 86 for middle-aged patients and 29 for elderly patients. Diuretic therapy remained more cost-effective even under the unlikely assumption that the newer drugs were 50% more effective than diuretics at preventing these major events. The costs associated with potassium supplementation did not eliminate the advantage of diuretics. Treatment costs to prevent major hypertensive complications are much lower with diuretics and beta-blockers than with ACEI, CCB, or alpha-blockers, especially in middle-aged patients.
本研究的目的是比较噻嗪类利尿剂、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、α受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)用于预防单纯性高血压患者中风、心肌梗死(MI)和过早死亡的直接成本。我们基于对15项高血压治疗主要临床试验的荟萃分析得出的治疗需人数(NNT)以及每类中最常用和最便宜药物的平均批发价格进行了成本最小化分析。临床试验的纳入标准为:它们是将单纯性轻至中度高血压药物治疗随机对照试验,以中风、MI或死亡为终点。我们的结果指标是预防中年和老年高血压患者中风、MI或死亡的批发药物成本和直接门诊治疗总成本。在中年患者中,预防一项主要事件(MI或中风或死亡)的估计批发药物购置成本在4730美元至346,236美元之间,在老年患者中为1595美元至116,754美元;使用普通利尿剂或β受体阻滞剂治疗比使用ACEI、α受体阻滞剂或CCB更经济。中年患者的相关5年NNT为86,老年患者为29。即使在不太可能的假设下,即新药在预防这些主要事件方面比利尿剂有效50%,利尿剂治疗仍然更具成本效益。与补钾相关的成本并未消除利尿剂的优势。利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂预防主要高血压并发症的治疗成本远低于ACEI、CCB或α受体阻滞剂,尤其是在中年患者中。