• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症急性胰腺炎初始治疗中的抗生素预防

Antibiotic prophylaxis in the initial management of severe acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Powell J J, Miles R, Siriwardena A K

机构信息

University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1998 May;85(5):582-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00767.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00767.x
PMID:9635800
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in the initial management of patients with acute pancreatitis is an area of major controversy. Contrary to earlier clinical trials, recent experimental and clinical studies have accrued evidence that warrants reappraisal of current clinical practice. This article reviews these recent advances in knowledge.

METHODS

All papers derived from a Medline search for the years 1990-1997 inclusive using the text words 'acute', 'pancreatitis', 'antibiotic' and 'antibiotics' were studied. Additional papers were derived from reference lists within papers identified by the Medline search. Only experimental and clinical papers relevant to the issue of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in acute pancreatitis are included in the review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Current experimental evidence favours the use of prophylactic antibiotics in severe acute pancreatitis. The results of contemporary randomized clinical trials restricted to patients with prognostically severe acute pancreatitis have demonstrated improvement in outcome associated with antibiotic treatment.

摘要

背景

抗生素预防性治疗在急性胰腺炎患者初始治疗中的作用是一个存在重大争议的领域。与早期临床试验相反,近期的实验和临床研究积累了一些证据,这些证据使得有必要对当前的临床实践进行重新评估。本文综述了这些最新的知识进展。

方法

研究了通过Medline检索1990年至1997年(含)期间使用关键词“急性”“胰腺炎”“抗生素”和“抗菌素”获得的所有论文。其他论文则来自Medline检索所确定论文的参考文献列表。本综述仅纳入与急性胰腺炎预防性抗生素治疗问题相关的实验和临床论文。

结果与结论

目前的实验证据支持在重症急性胰腺炎中使用预防性抗生素。仅限于预后严重的急性胰腺炎患者的当代随机临床试验结果表明,抗生素治疗可改善预后。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic prophylaxis in the initial management of severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎初始治疗中的抗生素预防
Br J Surg. 1998 May;85(5):582-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00767.x.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxia in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎患者的抗生素预防
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005 Feb;4(1):23-7.
3
Survey of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute pancreatitis in the UK and Ireland.英国和爱尔兰急性胰腺炎抗生素预防情况调查。
Br J Surg. 1999 Mar;86(3):320-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01052.x.
4
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute pancreatitis].[急性胰腺炎中的抗生素预防]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 May;22(131):465-8.
5
Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute necrotizing pancreatitis revisited.急性坏死性胰腺炎的抗生素预防再探讨。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Sep;43(9):1486-95. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M153. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
6
The weak evidence base for antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎抗生素预防性治疗的证据基础薄弱。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Nov-Dec;55(88):2233-7.
7
Prophylactic antibiotics cannot reduce infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性抗生素不能降低急性坏死性胰腺炎的感染性胰腺坏死及死亡率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析证据
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;103(1):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01575.x. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
8
Meta-analysis of prophylactic antibiotic use in acute necrotizing pancreatitis.急性坏死性胰腺炎预防性使用抗生素的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2006 Jun;93(6):674-84. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5389.
9
Preventing pancreatic infection in acute pancreatitis.预防急性胰腺炎中的胰腺感染。
J Hosp Infect. 2000 Apr;44(4):245-53. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0723.
10
[Reduced risk of complications associated with severe acute (necrotizing) pancreatitis by administration of antibiotics; results from a literature review].[通过使用抗生素降低重症急性(坏死性)胰腺炎相关并发症的风险;文献综述结果]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Oct 13;145(41):1982-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioactive Nanomaterials: Comprehensive Monitoring and Regulation of Acute Pancreatitis Induced Acute Lung Injury.生物活性纳米材料:急性胰腺炎诱导的急性肺损伤的综合监测与调控
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 Jul 31;20:9517-9558. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S514653. eCollection 2025.
2
Combinatory antibiotic treatment protects against experimental acute pancreatitis by suppressing gut bacterial translocation to pancreas and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome pathway.联合抗生素治疗通过抑制肠道细菌易位到胰腺和抑制 NLRP3 炎性体途径来预防实验性急性胰腺炎。
Innate Immun. 2020 Jan;26(1):48-61. doi: 10.1177/1753425919881502. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.
抗生素治疗预防急性胰腺炎胰腺坏死感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;2010(5):CD002941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002941.pub3.
4
The role of the intestine in the pathophysiology and management of severe acute pancreatitis.肠道在重症急性胰腺炎病理生理学及治疗中的作用
HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(2):69-85. doi: 10.1080/13651820310001108.
5
Planned staged reoperative necrosectomy using an abdominal zipper in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.使用腹部拉链进行计划性分期再次手术坏死组织清除术治疗坏死性胰腺炎。
Surg Today. 2005;35(10):833-40. doi: 10.1007/s00595-005-3045-0.
6
The effect of activated protein C on experimental acute necrotizing pancreatitis.活化蛋白C对实验性急性坏死性胰腺炎的影响。
Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):R184-90. doi: 10.1186/cc3485. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
7
Prophylactic antibiotics and pancreatic necrosis.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001 Apr;3(2):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s11894-001-0006-7.
8
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment strategy according to the status of infection.急性坏死性胰腺炎:根据感染状况的治疗策略
Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):619-26. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00001.
9
Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini Consensus Conference.急性胰腺炎的诊断、严重程度的客观评估及管理。圣托里尼共识会议。
Int J Pancreatol. 1999 Aug;26(1):1-2; discussion 2-3. doi: 10.1385/ijgc:26:1:1.
10
Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference.急性胰腺炎的诊断、严重程度的客观评估及管理。圣托里尼共识会议。
Int J Pancreatol. 1999 Jun;25(3):195-210. doi: 10.1007/BF02925968.