• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女同性恋婚姻和男同性恋婚姻的模糊性:象征秩序中的变化与延续

The ambiguity of lesbian and gay marriages: change and continuity in the symbolic order.

作者信息

Halvorsen R

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Dragvoll, Norway.

出版信息

J Homosex. 1998;35(3-4):207-31. doi: 10.1300/J082v35n03_09.

DOI:10.1300/J082v35n03_09
PMID:9638564
Abstract

The article discusses the Registered Partnership Act, passed in Norway in 1993, which has given gay and lesbian couples a right to register their relationship and to obtain many of the legal rights that heterosexual couples have. The article argues that the introduction of the Act is a product of, among others, cohabitation having become more legitimate as a life-form also among heterosexuals. The practical consequences of the Act have been modest, with relatively few couples having registered their relationship. The article suggests that the symbolic rather than the practical aspects of the Act have been important, and even then, the symbolic effect of the Act is equivocal. The new formal rights of gays and lesbians are of decreasing social and symbolic value, as new boundaries for legitimate life-forms are being demarcated elsewhere: While legislation on marriage concedes that personal relationships are a private matter, the right to have and to foster children is regarded as an issue where society at large should have a say. This view is also reflected in the restrictions that the Registered Partnership Act has placed on gay and lesbian couples in having children of their own.

摘要

本文讨论了1993年在挪威通过的《注册伴侣关系法》,该法案赋予了同性恋伴侣登记其关系并获得许多异性恋伴侣所拥有的合法权利的权利。文章认为,该法案的出台是多种因素作用的结果,其中包括同居在异性恋中也已成为一种更合法的生活形式。该法案的实际效果并不显著,登记关系的伴侣相对较少。文章指出,该法案的象征意义而非实际意义更为重要,即便如此,该法案的象征效果也并不明确。同性恋者的新形式权利的社会和象征价值在不断降低,因为合法生活形式的新界限正在其他地方划定:虽然婚姻立法承认个人关系是私事,但生育和抚养孩子的权利被视为整个社会都应有所发言权的问题。这种观点也反映在《注册伴侣关系法》对同性恋伴侣生育自己孩子所设置的限制上。

相似文献

1
The ambiguity of lesbian and gay marriages: change and continuity in the symbolic order.女同性恋婚姻和男同性恋婚姻的模糊性:象征秩序中的变化与延续
J Homosex. 1998;35(3-4):207-31. doi: 10.1300/J082v35n03_09.
2
Gay and lesbian politics: assimilation or subversion: a Danish perspective.同性恋政治:同化还是颠覆:丹麦视角
J Homosex. 1998;35(3-4):233-43. doi: 10.1300/J082v35n03_10.
3
Czech lesbian activism: gay and lesbian parental rights as a challenge to patriarchal marriage.捷克女同性恋维权运动:同性恋父母权利对父权制婚姻的挑战。
J Lesbian Stud. 2011;15(3):356-83. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2010.530155.
4
The rise and fall of civil unions: lessons from the Connecticut legislature's abandonment of gay and lesbian citizens.民事结合的兴衰:康涅狄格州立法机构放弃同性恋公民的教训。
J Homosex. 2011;58(3):315-29. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2011.546727.
5
Pioneers in partnership: lesbian and gay male couples in civil unions compared with those not in civil unions and married heterosexual siblings.伴侣关系中的先驱者:民事结合中的女同性恋和男同性恋伴侣与未处于民事结合中的伴侣以及已婚异性恋兄弟姐妹的比较
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Jun;18(2):275-86. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.275.
6
Effect of Registered Partnership on Labor Earnings and Fertility for Same-Sex Couples: Evidence From Swedish Register Data.注册伴侣关系对同性伴侣劳动收入和生育的影响:来自瑞典登记数据的证据
Demography. 2015 Aug;52(4):1243-68. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0403-4.
7
Change in relationship quality for partners from lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual couples.女同性恋、男同性恋和异性恋伴侣关系质量的变化。
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Oct;22(5):701-11. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.5.701.
8
Advancing human rights through constitutional protection for gays and lesbians in South Africa.通过南非宪法对同性恋者的保护来推进人权。
J Homosex. 2005;48(3-4):141-62. doi: 10.1300/J082v48n03_08.
9
In search of a more perfect heteroarchy:Vermont, civil unions and the harm of "separate-but-equal".寻找更完美的异层级制度:佛蒙特州、民事结合与“隔离但平等”的危害
J Homosex. 2005;50(1):27-51. doi: 10.1300/J082v50n01_02.
10
Children of lesbian and gay parents: psychology, law, and policy.同性恋父母的子女:心理学、法律和政策。
Am Psychol. 2009 Nov;64(8):727-36. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.727.