Sandhu S, Driscoll P, Nancarrow J, McHugh D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK.
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 May;15(3):147-50. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.3.147.
To assess senior house officers' knowledge in prescribing emergency analgesia for acute presentations in the accident and emergency (A&E) department.
Prospective telephone survey of a defined population of SHOs, using a standardised structured questionnaire, in the months of October and November, 1995; 231 SHOs from 215 A&E departments were interviewed. The questionnaire required responses to hypothetical scenarios. A six member expert panel from the local region was consulted for suggestions for appropriate responses.
Comparisons between SHO responses and those of an expert panel.
For choice of analgesic agent, 83% of SHO responses were appropriate, for route of administration 57%, and for the dose of drug 34%. The scenario with the best overall response was a sprained ankle. The paediatric case with partial burns faired worse. Responses to a myocardial infarction scenario were the most consistent.
A&E SHOs lack knowledge and confidence when asked to prescribe emergency analgesia for acute conditions. Responses to certain scenarios were extremely varied, indicating a need for national analgesia guidelines and protocols. Recognised training in pain management should be more readily available.
评估住院医师在为急诊部门急性病症开具紧急镇痛药物方面的知识水平。
于1995年10月和11月,使用标准化结构化问卷对特定人群的住院医师进行前瞻性电话调查;对来自215个急诊部门的231名住院医师进行了访谈。问卷要求对假设情景做出回答。咨询了当地的一个六人专家小组以获取适当回答的建议。
住院医师的回答与专家小组回答之间的比较。
对于镇痛药物的选择,83%的住院医师回答正确;给药途径方面为57%;药物剂量方面为34%。总体回答最佳的情景是脚踝扭伤。部分烧伤的儿科病例情况较差。对心肌梗死情景的回答最为一致。
当被要求为急性病症开具紧急镇痛药物时,急诊住院医师缺乏知识和信心。对某些情景的回答差异极大,表明需要国家镇痛指南和方案。应更易于获得认可的疼痛管理培训。