• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种磷灰石骨水泥的生物相容性

Biocompatibility of two apatite cements.

作者信息

Steinbrunner R L, Brown C E, Legan J J, Kafrawy A H

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis 46202-5186, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 1998 May;24(5):335-42. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80130-1.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80130-1
PMID:9641109
Abstract

Biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of two calcium phosphate cements (G-5 and G-6) and Super-EBA were investigated by subcutaneous and intraosseous implantation in 90 rats. Reactions were studied microscopically at 15, 30, and 60 days after implantation. Super-EBA was well tolerated by both soft and hard tissues. G-5 was highly biocompatible with resorption and bone replacement at intraosseous implantation sites. G-6 promoted moderate inflammation and a foreign body giant cell response over the 60-day study period. None of the materials elicited osteogenesis or dystrophic calcification at the subcutaneous implantation sites.

摘要

通过对90只大鼠进行皮下和骨内植入,研究了两种磷酸钙骨水泥(G-5和G-6)以及Super-EBA的生物相容性和成骨潜力。在植入后15、30和60天进行显微镜下反应研究。Super-EBA在软组织和硬组织中均具有良好的耐受性。G-5在骨内植入部位具有高度生物相容性,伴有吸收和骨替代。在60天的研究期内,G-6引发了中度炎症和异物巨细胞反应。在皮下植入部位,没有一种材料引发骨生成或营养不良性钙化。

相似文献

1
Biocompatibility of two apatite cements.两种磷灰石骨水泥的生物相容性
J Endod. 1998 May;24(5):335-42. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80130-1.
2
An investigation of the effects of a tricalcium phosphate--zinc polyacrylate cement implant on bone.
J Can Dent Assoc. 1981 Jun;47(6):377-80.
3
Biocompatibility of an adhesive system and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate.
ASDC J Dent Child. 1999 Sep-Oct;66(5):337-42, 294.
4
Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of Dyract and Super EBA.Dyract与Super EBA骨内生物相容性的比较。
J Endod. 1997 May;23(5):315-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80413-X.
5
[Biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite and of tricalcium phosphate with bone tissue].[羟基磷灰石和磷酸三钙与骨组织的生物相容性]
Dent Cadmos. 1987 Mar 15;55(4):55-7.
6
Comparison of two implantation sites for testing intraosseous biocompatibility.
J Endod. 1999 Sep;25(9):615-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80321-5.
7
Tissue response to a newly developed calcium phosphate cement containing succinic acid and carboxymethyl-chitin.组织对一种新开发的含琥珀酸和羧甲基壳聚糖的磷酸钙骨水泥的反应。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Mar 1;64(3):491-501. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10398.
8
Study of the osteoconductive properties of bioactive glass fibers.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 Nov;23(11):1289-97. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820231106.
9
Reactions of connective tissue to amalgam, intermediate restorative material, mineral trioxide aggregate, and mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with chlorhexidine.结缔组织对汞合金、中间修复材料、三氧化矿物凝聚体以及与洗必泰混合的三氧化矿物凝聚体的反应。
J Endod. 2006 Nov;32(11):1094-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.012.
10
Biocompatibility of tetracalcium phosphate cement when used as a bone substitute.
Biomaterials. 1993 May;14(6):403-6. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90141-n.

引用本文的文献

1
Biocompatibility issues with modern implants in bone - a review for clinical orthopedics.现代骨植入物的生物相容性问题——临床骨科综述
Open Orthop J. 2008 Apr 25;2:66-78. doi: 10.2174/1874325000802010066.