Sun J, Sheng X, Chou Z
Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1997 Oct;32(10):601-4.
To evaluate the effectiveness of different therapeutic modalities of endometrial carcinoma in stage I and stage II.
From 1984 to 1992, 205 patients with endometrial carcinoma in stage I and stage II were treated in our hospital. The clinical and pathological data were analyzed retrospectively. There were 122 cases in stage I and 83 in stage II. According to therapeutic methods, patients could be divided into 4 groups. Group 1 (surgery group): 81 cases; Group 2 (full dose preoperative intracavitary afterloading irradiation, A point 45G y +/- 10%, F point 50 Gy +/- 10%): 62 cases; Group 3 (non-full dose preoperative intracavitary afterloading irradiation, doses at both point A and point F less than 1/2 of full dose mentioned above): 36 cases; Group 4 (radiotherapy alone): 26 cases. There were no significant differences in pathological type, differential grade, median age and operative methods among the 4 groups.
The 5-year survival rate of group 1 to group 4 was 83.1%, 96.5%, 84.8% and 62.5% respectively in stage I, and 82.0%, 90.9%, 51.4% and 62.7% respectively in stage II. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in group 2 (P < 0.05).
The results suggested that operation combined with full dose preoperative intracavitary afterloading irradiation provided the best therapeutic effect, whereas non-full dose preoperative intracavitary afterloading irradiation showed none of benefit.
评估Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期子宫内膜癌不同治疗方式的疗效。
1984年至1992年,我院收治205例Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期子宫内膜癌患者。对其临床和病理资料进行回顾性分析。其中Ⅰ期122例,Ⅱ期83例。根据治疗方法,患者可分为4组。第1组(手术组):81例;第2组(术前腔内后装全量照射,A点45Gy±10%,F点50Gy±10%):62例;第3组(术前腔内后装非全量照射,A点和F点剂量均小于上述全量的1/2):36例;第4组(单纯放疗组):26例。4组患者的病理类型、分化程度、中位年龄及手术方式差异均无统计学意义。
Ⅰ期第1组至第4组的5年生存率分别为83.1%、96.5%、84.8%和62.5%,Ⅱ期分别为82.0%、90.9%、51.4%和62.7%。第2组的5年生存率显著更高(P<0.05)。
结果表明,手术联合术前腔内后装全量照射疗效最佳,而术前腔内后装非全量照射无益处。