Suppr超能文献

霉酚酸酯用于尸体肾移植的一项前瞻性、长期、随机多中心研究:三年结果。三大洲霉酚酸酯肾移植研究组。

A blinded, long-term, randomized multicenter study of mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation: results at three years. Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group.

作者信息

Mathew T H

机构信息

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1998 Jun 15;65(11):1450-4. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199806150-00007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three large-scale clinical trials conducted in North America, Europe, and Australia showed that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) decreases the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection in the first 6 months after transplant compared with placebo or azathioprine. This study extends the randomized, prospective, double-blind trial of MMF conducted by the Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group.

METHODS

Patients (n=503) were randomized to receive 100-150 mg of azathioprine (AZA) (n=166), 2 g of MMF (n=173), or 3 g of MMF (n=164) per day, in conjunction with cyclosporine and prednisone from the time of transplantation.

RESULTS

During the first 6 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute graft rejection (BPR) was reduced by approximately 50% in the MMF 2 g (19.7%) and MMF 3 g (15.9%) groups compared with the AZA group (35.5%). The incidence of treatment failure during the first 6 months, including BPR, death, graft loss, and early withdrawal without prior BPR, was significantly decreased: AZA, 50%, compared with MMF 2 g, 38.2% (P=0.0287), and MMF 3 g, 34.8% (P=0.0045). At 3 years after transplant, both intent-to-treat and on-study (censoring at 90 days after treatment) analyses of graft and patient survival showed a trend toward advantage for MMF 2 g and 3 g vs. AZA (intent-to-treat: 81.9% and 84.8% vs. 80.2%; on-study: 84.0% and 86.4% vs. 82.7%), although this trend did not reach statistical significance. Rejection was the principal cause of graft loss in all groups: AZA, 9.9%; MMF 2 g, 5.8%; and MMF 3 g, 3.0%. Graft function (intent-to-treat and on-study) was comparable in all three groups at 3 years. Gastrointestinal toxicity, leukopenia, and tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease were more common in the MMF 3 g group both during and after the first posttransplant year. Lymphoproliferative disorders were diagnosed in one AZA (0.6%), two MMF 2 g (1.2%), and three MMF 3 g (1.8%) patients. Other (non-lymphoproliferative disorders, noncutaneous) malignancies occurred in six AZA (3.7%), four MMF 2 g (2.3%), and nine MMF 3 g (5.5%) patients. Mortality was comparable in all three groups (AZA, 8.6%; MMF 2 g, 4.7%; MMF 3 g, 9.1%) by 3 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

MMF significantly reduced the incidence of rejection in the first 6 months, but there was not a significant improvement in graft survival throughout the 3 years after cadaver kidney transplantation.

摘要

背景

在北美、欧洲和澳大利亚进行的三项大规模临床试验表明,与安慰剂或硫唑嘌呤相比,霉酚酸酯(MMF)可降低移植后前6个月急性肾移植排斥反应的发生率。本研究扩展了三大洲霉酚酸酯肾移植研究组进行的MMF随机、前瞻性、双盲试验。

方法

患者(n = 503)被随机分为每天接受100 - 150毫克硫唑嘌呤(AZA)(n = 166)、2克MMF(n = 173)或3克MMF(n = 164),从移植时起联合环孢素和泼尼松治疗。

结果

在最初6个月内,与AZA组(35.5%)相比,MMF 2克组(19.7%)和MMF 3克组(15.9%)经活检证实的急性移植排斥反应(BPR)发生率降低了约50%。最初6个月内治疗失败的发生率,包括BPR、死亡、移植肾丢失以及无先前BPR情况下的早期退出,显著降低:AZA组为50%,而MMF 2克组为38.2%(P = 0.0287),MMF 3克组为34.8%(P = 0.0045)。移植后3年,在意向性治疗和实际治疗(治疗90天后进行截尾)分析中,MMF 2克和3克组在移植肾和患者生存率方面与AZA组相比均有优势趋势(意向性治疗:分别为81.9%、84.8%和80.2%;实际治疗:分别为84.0%、86.4%和82.7%),尽管这一趋势未达到统计学显著性。排斥反应是所有组移植肾丢失的主要原因:AZA组为9.9%;MMF 2克组为5.8%;MMF 3克组为3.0%。3年时,所有三组的移植肾功能(意向性治疗和实际治疗)相当。在移植后第一年期间及之后,胃肠道毒性、白细胞减少症和组织侵袭性巨细胞病毒疾病在MMF 3克组更为常见。在1例AZA患者(0.6%)、2例MMF 2克患者(1.2%)和3例MMF 3克患者(1.8%)中诊断出淋巴增殖性疾病。其他(非淋巴增殖性疾病、非皮肤)恶性肿瘤发生在6例AZA患者(3.7%)、4例MMF 2克患者(2.3%)和9例MMF 3克患者(5.5%)中。随访3年时,所有三组的死亡率相当(AZA组为8.6%;MMF 2克组为4.7%;MMF 3克组为9.1%)。

结论

MMF在最初6个月显著降低了排斥反应的发生率,但在尸体肾移植后的3年中,移植肾生存率并未显著提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验