Suppr超能文献

霉酚酸酯预防尸体肾移植受者急性排斥反应的研究。美国肾移植霉酚酸酯研究组。

Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group.

作者信息

Sollinger H W

机构信息

Boston University Medical Center, MA, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1995 Aug 15;60(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199508000-00003.

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a new immunosuppressant that selectively inhibits proliferation of T and B lymphocytes, may reduce the frequency and severity of acute graft rejection. Acute graft rejection is the leading cause of graft loss in cadaveric renal transplantation. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF for the prevention of acute rejection episodes in adult patients during the first 6 months after renal transplantation. A total of 499 patients who were to receive a primary cadaveric renal allograft as their first transplant were randomized to receive MMF 1.0 g b.i.d. (MMF 2 g treatment group), MMF 1.5 g b.i.d. (MMF 3 g treatment group), or azathioprine 1-2 mg/kg/day. CsA, corticosteroids, and antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM) were administered as part of a quadruple sequential induction protocol. The primary efficacy endpoint was biopsy-proven rejection or treatment failure (defined as graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal from the study for any reason) during the first 6 months after transplant. All enrolled patients were included in the primary analyses of efficacy on the basis of intent to treat. The 495 patients who received study drug were included in the safety and secondary efficacy analyses. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes or treatment failure occurred in 47.6% of patients in the azathioprine group compared with 31.1% (P = 0.0015) and 31.3% (P = 0.0021) of patients in the MMF 2 g and 3 g treatment groups, respectively. Time to first biopsy-proven rejection episode or treatment failure was significantly longer for MMF 2 g versus azathioprine (P = 0.0036) and MMF 3 g versus azathioprine (P = 0.0006). First biopsy-proven rejection alone occurred in 38.0% of patients who received azathioprine compared with 19.8% and 17.5% of patients who received MMF 2 g and 3 g, respectively. Patients in the azathioprine group received a greater number of full courses of antirejection treatment as compared with the MMF 2 g and MMF 3 g groups (44.5%, 24.8%, and 21.1%, respectively). The use of antilymphocyte agents to treat rejection was greater in the azathioprine group (20.1%) compared with the MMF 2 g group (10.3%) and the MMF 3 g group (5.4%). At 6 months after transplant, graft and patient survival were similar in all 3 treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

霉酚酸酯(MMF)是一种新型免疫抑制剂,可选择性抑制T和B淋巴细胞的增殖,可能会降低急性移植物排斥反应的发生率和严重程度。急性移植物排斥反应是尸体肾移植中移植物丢失的主要原因。这项随机、双盲、多中心研究的目的是评估MMF在肾移植术后前6个月预防成年患者急性排斥反应发作的疗效和安全性。共有499例将接受首例尸体肾同种异体移植的患者被随机分为接受MMF 1.0 g每日两次(MMF 2 g治疗组)、MMF 1.5 g每日两次(MMF 3 g治疗组)或硫唑嘌呤1 - 2 mg/kg/天。环孢素A(CsA)、皮质类固醇和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATGAM)作为四联序贯诱导方案的一部分进行给药。主要疗效终点是移植后前6个月经活检证实的排斥反应或治疗失败(定义为移植物丢失、死亡或因任何原因提前退出研究)。所有入组患者均根据意向性治疗原则纳入主要疗效分析。接受研究药物的495例患者纳入安全性和次要疗效分析。硫唑嘌呤组47.6%的患者发生了经活检证实的急性排斥反应发作或治疗失败,而MMF 2 g治疗组和MMF 3 g治疗组分别为31.1%(P = 0.0015)和及31.3%(P = 0.0021)。MMF 2 g组与硫唑嘌呤组相比,首次经活检证实的排斥反应发作或治疗失败的时间显著延长(P = 0.0036),MMF 3 g组与硫唑嘌呤组相比也显著延长(P = 0.0006)。仅接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者中38.0%发生了首次经活检证实的排斥反应,而接受MMF 2 g和MMF 3 g治疗的患者分别为19.8%和17.5%。与MMF 2 g组和MMF 3 g组相比,硫唑嘌呤组接受抗排斥治疗完整疗程的患者更多(分别为44.5%、24.8%和21.1%)。与MMF 2 g组(10.3%)和MMF 3 g组(5.4%)相比,硫唑嘌呤组使用抗淋巴细胞药物治疗排斥反应的比例更高(20.1%)。移植后6个月时,所有3个治疗组的移植物和患者存活率相似。(摘要截短至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验