Suppr超能文献

人工生殖与未来家庭。

Artificial reproduction and the family of the future.

作者信息

Lupton M L

机构信息

School of Law, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, S. Africa.

出版信息

Med Law. 1998;17(1):93-111.

PMID:9646597
Abstract

The techniques of artificial reproduction have until fairly recently been geared to overcoming male sterility by means of AID and IPSI and female sterility by way of GIFT, VISPER and DIPI. The above techniques have concentrated on achieving conception either within or without the uterus. Gestation has always been completed in utero and the therapy was reserved for married couples. The above circumstances only required limited legal regulation and its effect on the family unit was minimal because the child was mostly conceived from the gametes of its parents New technologies which are looming on the horizon, however, threaten to change the concept of parent and family radically. I refer to the imminent perfection of the artificial uterus and the cloning of human cells. If these technologies are sanctioned, a child would be conceived from the cells of one parent only and will not be gestated within the mother's womb. How will society and the law react to these technologies? Will they regulate them or proscribe them? I will argue in favour of the former rather than the latter.

摘要

直到最近,人工生殖技术一直致力于通过人工授精(AID)和宫腔内配子移植(IPSI)克服男性不育,以及通过配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)、输卵管内胚泡移植(VISPER)和经阴道输卵内配子移植(DIPI)克服女性不育。上述技术专注于在子宫内或子宫外实现受孕。妊娠始终在子宫内完成,且该疗法仅适用于已婚夫妇。上述情况仅需要有限的法律监管,并且其对家庭单元的影响微乎其微,因为孩子大多是由其父母的配子孕育而成。然而,即将出现的新技术有可能从根本上改变父母和家庭的概念。我指的是人工子宫即将完善以及人类细胞克隆技术。如果这些技术得到认可,孩子将仅由一方父母的细胞孕育而成,且不会在母亲子宫内孕育。社会和法律将如何应对这些技术?它们会对其进行监管还是予以禁止?我将主张支持前者而非后者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验