• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜超声检查与胆管造影术在胆总管结石诊断中的应用比较

Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

作者信息

Canto M I, Chak A, Stellato T, Sivak M V

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), University Hospitals of Cleveland-Case Western Reserve University, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jun;47(6):439-48. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70242-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70242-1
PMID:9647366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Choledocholithiasis is a major source of morbidity among patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. There is no consensus on the best approach to diagnosing bile duct stones. We compared the safety, accuracy, diagnostic yield, and cost of EUS- and ERCP-based approaches.

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive pre- and post-cholecystectomy patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected choledocholithiasis were prospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion. All were stratified into risk groups using predefined criteria. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and ERCP were sequentially performed by two endoscopists.

RESULTS

The success rates of EUS and ERCP were 98% and 94%, respectively. The accuracy of EUS for diagnosing choledocholithiasis was 94%. EUS provided an additional or alternative diagnosis to bile duct stones in 21% of patients. The complication rate of EUS was significantly lower than diagnostic ERCP. An EUS-based strategy costs less than diagnostic ERCP in patients with low, moderate, or intermediate risk.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS is comparably accurate, but safer and less costly than ERCP for evaluating patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. It is useful in patients with an increased risk of having common bile duct stones based on clinical criteria and those with contraindications for or prior unsuccessful ERCP. EUS may enable selective performance of ERCP and improve the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing choledocholithiasis.

摘要

背景

胆总管结石是有症状胆结石患者行胆囊切除术时发病的主要原因。对于胆管结石的最佳诊断方法尚无共识。我们比较了基于超声内镜(EUS)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)方法的安全性、准确性、诊断率及成本。

方法

连续64例因疑似胆总管结石而接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查的胆囊切除术前及术后患者,以盲法进行前瞻性评估。所有患者均使用预定义标准分层为风险组。由两名内镜医师依次进行内镜超声检查(EUS)和ERCP。

结果

EUS和ERCP的成功率分别为98%和94%。EUS诊断胆总管结石的准确性为94%。EUS为21%的患者提供了胆管结石的额外或替代诊断。EUS的并发症发生率显著低于诊断性ERCP。对于低、中或中度风险患者,基于EUS的策略成本低于诊断性ERCP。

结论

对于评估疑似胆总管结石的患者,EUS的准确性相当,但比ERCP更安全且成本更低。对于根据临床标准胆总管结石风险增加的患者以及有ERCP禁忌证或既往ERCP不成功的患者,EUS很有用。EUS可使ERCP选择性进行,并提高胆总管结石诊断的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.内镜超声检查与胆管造影术在胆总管结石诊断中的应用比较
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jun;47(6):439-48. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70242-1.
2
Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography.内镜超声检查诊断胆总管结石:与超声检查和计算机断层扫描的前瞻性对比研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Feb;45(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70237-2.
3
Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging.在经腹超声检查正常的患者中,基于内镜超声与内镜逆行胰胆管造影的策略在疑似胆总管结石评估中的应用比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Oct 15;26(8):1163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03463.x.
4
Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones.线性内镜超声检查在疑似胆总管结石患者评估中的准确性
Endoscopy. 2002 Apr;34(4):299-303. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-23641.
5
[The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis without common bile duct dilatation].[内镜超声检查在诊断无胆总管扩张的胆总管结石中的应用价值]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;56(2):97-102. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2010.56.2.97.
6
A Prospective Blinded Study Evaluating the Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound before Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Setting of "Positive" Intraoperative Cholangiogram during Cholecystectomy.一项前瞻性盲法研究,评估在胆囊切除术期间术中胆管造影“阳性”情况下,内镜超声检查在逆行胰胆管造影术前的作用。
Am Surg. 2016 Apr;82(4):343-7.
7
Successful single-session endosonography-based endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography without fluoroscopy in pregnant patients with suspected choledocholithiasis: a case series.基于超声内镜的单期无荧光内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在疑似胆总管结石的孕妇中的成功应用:病例系列
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Feb;21(2):93-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.7. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
8
Predictors for choledocholitiasis in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound.接受内镜超声检查患者胆总管结石的预测因素
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;53(3):335-339. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1435716. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
Routine endoscopic ultrasound in moderate and indeterminate risk patients of suspected choledocholithiasis to avoid unwarranted ERCP: A prospective randomized blinded study.对疑似胆总管结石的中度和不确定风险患者进行常规内镜超声检查以避免不必要的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;34(4):300-4. doi: 10.1007/s12664-015-0581-4. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Linear EUS for bile duct stones.用于胆管结石的线性超声内镜检查
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Jan;51(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70387-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Managing Common Bile Duct Calculi.腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的前瞻性对比研究
Cureus. 2025 Apr 23;17(4):e82827. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82827. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Failing to prepare: the erosion of intraoperative cholangiography in the rising surgical workforce-a national review of general surgery residents' laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram experience.准备不足:不断增加的外科手术人员中术中胆管造影术的式微——一项关于普通外科住院医师腹腔镜胆囊切除术及术中胆管造影经验的全国性综述
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3648-3653. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11733-1. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
Evaluation of ASGE Criteria for Prediction of Choledocholithiasis: Can Early Endoscopic Ultrasound Utilization Make the Prediction More Accurate?美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)预测胆总管结石标准的评估:早期内镜超声检查的应用能否使预测更准确?
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Feb 6;37:2. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.2. eCollection 2023.
4
One hundred most cited articles related to Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A bibliometric analysis.与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术相关的100篇被引用次数最多的文章:一项文献计量分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 9;9:1005771. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005771. eCollection 2022.
5
Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural imaging and timing of ERCP.疑似胆总管结石:术前影像学检查和 ERCP 时机可减少不必要的 ERCP。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1194-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09615-x. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis.ASGE 指南:内镜在胆石病评估和管理中的作用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
7
Dynamic liver test patterns do not predict bile duct stones.动态肝功能试验模式不能预测胆管结石。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3300-3313. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06620-x. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
8
Efficacy of the Endoscopic Ultrasound-first Approach in Patients with Suspected Common Bile Duct Stone to Avoid Unnecessary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.超声内镜优先法在疑似胆总管结石患者中避免不必要的内镜逆行胰胆管造影的疗效
Intern Med. 2019 Jun 15;58(12):1673-1679. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2047-18. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
The added value of tomosynthesis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with radiography for the detection of choledocholithiasis.断层合成技术在内镜逆行胆管造影联合放射成像检测胆总管结石中的附加价值。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20180115. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180115. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Endoscopic Ultrasonography Can Prevent Unnecessary Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Even in Patients with High Likelihood of Choledocholithiasis and Inconclusive Ultrasonography: Results of a Prospective Study.即使在胆总管结石可能性高且超声检查结果不明确的患者中,内镜超声检查也可避免不必要的诊断性内镜逆行胰胆管造影:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Clin Endosc. 2017 Nov;50(6):592-597. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.010. Epub 2017 Aug 9.