Suppr超能文献

透析剂量输送的在线评估。

On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose.

作者信息

Di Filippo S, Andrulli S, Manzoni C, Corti M, Locatelli F

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Lecco Hospital, Italy.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 1998 Jul;54(1):263-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00979.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The adequacy of the delivered dialysis dose is essential to prevent patient morbidity and mortality. The determination of effective ionic dialysance (D) is easy, non-invasive and inexpensive, and its use instead of effective urea clearance (K) in kinetically determining apparent" urea distribution volume (Vt) is likely to lead to a correct Kt/V, even though the Vt value may be incorrect. The aim of this study was to test the possibility of using the measurement of D to monitor Kt/V on-line during each dialysis treatment.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were dialyzed using a monitor equipped with specially designed "Diascan Module" (COT; Hospal) that measures effective D by means of a single conductivity probe. Vt was calculated according to the SPVV three BUN method urea kinetic model using D instead of K values. One month later, Kt/V was calculated as Dt/V, using actual D and T values and the predetermined Vt values updated for the current final body wt. Both the Dt/V and Kt/V determined according to the Smye and Daugirdas methods were compared with the Kt/V determined using the SPVV kinetic model (Kt/Veq)

RESULTS

The Kt/V values calculated using ionic dialysance and predetermined Vt were approximately equivalent to those of Kt/Veq (1.14 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.14 +/- 0.17, mean difference 0.00 +/- 0.07), as were those determined according to the Smye and Daugirdas methods (1.10 +/- 0.18 and 1.13 +/- 0.17, mean difference -0.03 +/- 0.06 and 0.01 +/- 0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Once Vt has been determined, the evaluation of ionic dialysance in stable patients makes it possible to calculate the Kt/V accurately at each dialysis session without blood or dialysate sampling, and at no additional cost.

摘要

背景

给予足够的透析剂量对于预防患者发病和死亡至关重要。有效离子透析率(D)的测定简便、无创且成本低廉,在动力学测定表观“尿素分布容积(Vt)时,用其替代有效尿素清除率(K)虽可能导致Vt值不准确,但仍可能得出正确的Kt/V。本研究旨在测试在每次透析治疗期间使用D测量值在线监测Kt/V的可能性。

方法

44例患者使用配备专门设计的“Diascan模块”(COT;Hospal)的监测仪进行透析,该监测仪通过单个电导率探头测量有效D。根据SPVV三BUN方法尿素动力学模型,使用D而非K值计算Vt。1个月后,使用实际D和T值以及根据当前最终体重更新的预定Vt值,将Kt/V计算为Dt/V。将根据Smye和Daugirdas方法确定的Dt/V和Kt/V与使用SPVV动力学模型确定的Kt/V(Kt/Veq)进行比较。

结果

使用离子透析率和预定Vt计算的Kt/V值与Kt/Veq值大致相当(1.14±0.16对1.14±0.17,平均差异0.00±0.07),根据Smye和Daugirdas方法确定的Kt/V值也是如此(分别为1.10±0.18和1.13±0.17,平均差异分别为-0.03±0.06和0.01±0.06)。

结论

一旦确定了Vt,对于稳定患者评估离子透析率使得在每次透析时无需采集血液或透析液样本且无需额外费用即可准确计算Kt/V成为可能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验