• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性刺激性泻药引起的结肠解剖结构改变:再探泻剂性结肠。

Alterations in colonic anatomy induced by chronic stimulant laxatives: the cathartic colon revisited.

作者信息

Joo J S, Ehrenpreis E D, Gonzalez L, Kaye M, Breno S, Wexner S D, Zaitman D, Secrest K

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):283-6. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199806000-00014.

DOI:10.1097/00004836-199806000-00014
PMID:9649012
Abstract

Cathartic colon is a historic term for the anatomic alteration of the colon secondary to chronic stimulant laxative use. Because some have questioned whether this is a real entity, we investigated changes occurring on barium enema in patients ingesting stimulant laxatives. Our study consisted of two parts. In part 1, a retrospective review of consecutive barium enemas performed on two groups of patients with chronic constipation (group 1, stimulant laxative use [n=29]; group 2, no stimulant laxative use [n=26]) was presented to a radiologist who was blinded to the patient group. A data sheet containing classic descriptions of cathartic colon was completed for each study. Chronic stimulant laxative use was defined as stimulant laxative ingestion more than three times per week for 1 year or longer. To confirm the findings of the retrospective study, 18 consecutive patients who were chronic stimulant laxative users underwent barium enema examination, and data sheets for cathartic colon were completed by another radiologist (part 2). Colonic redundancy (group 1, 34.5%; group 2, 19.2%) and dilatation (group 1, 44.8%; group 2, 23.1%) were frequent radiographic findings in both patient groups and were not significantly different in the two groups. Loss of haustral folds, however, was a common finding in group 1 (27.6%) but was not seen in group 2 (p < 0.005). Loss of haustral markings occurred in 15 (40.5%) of the total stimulant laxative users in the two parts of the study and was seen in the left colon of 6 (40%) patients, in the right colon of 2 (13.3%) patients, in the transverse colon of 5 (33.3%) patients, and in the entire colon of 2 (13.3%) patients. Loss of haustra was seen in patients chronically ingesting bisacodyl, phenolpthalein, senna, and casanthranol. We conclude that long-term stimulant laxative use results in anatomic changes in the colon characterized by loss of haustral folds, a finding that suggests neuronal injury or damage to colonic longitudinal musculature caused by these agents.

摘要

泻剂性结肠是一个历史术语,用于描述因长期使用刺激性泻药导致的结肠解剖结构改变。由于有人质疑这是否是一种真实存在的病症,我们对服用刺激性泻药的患者进行钡剂灌肠检查时出现的变化进行了研究。我们的研究分为两个部分。在第一部分中,将两组慢性便秘患者(第1组,使用刺激性泻药[n = 29];第2组,未使用刺激性泻药[n = 26])连续进行的钡剂灌肠检查结果回顾性呈现给一位对患者分组不知情的放射科医生。为每项研究填写一份包含泻剂性结肠经典描述的数据表。长期使用刺激性泻药的定义为每周服用刺激性泻药超过三次,持续1年或更长时间。为了证实回顾性研究的结果,18名连续的长期使用刺激性泻药的患者接受了钡剂灌肠检查,另一位放射科医生填写了泻剂性结肠的数据表(第二部分)。结肠冗长(第1组,34.5%;第2组,19.2%)和扩张(第1组,44.8%;第2组,23.1%)在两组患者中都是常见的影像学表现,且两组之间无显著差异。然而,结肠袋消失在第1组中是常见表现(27.6%),而在第2组中未见(p < 0.005)。在研究的两个部分中,总共15名(40.5%)使用刺激性泻药的患者出现结肠袋纹消失,其中6名(40%)患者出现在左半结肠,2名(13.3%)患者出现在右半结肠,5名(33.3%)患者出现在横结肠,2名(13.3%)患者出现在全结肠。长期服用比沙可啶、酚酞、番泻叶和卡森烷醇的患者出现结肠袋消失。我们得出结论,长期使用刺激性泻药会导致结肠出现解剖学变化,其特征为结肠袋消失,这一发现提示这些药物导致了神经元损伤或结肠纵行肌损伤。

相似文献

1
Alterations in colonic anatomy induced by chronic stimulant laxatives: the cathartic colon revisited.慢性刺激性泻药引起的结肠解剖结构改变:再探泻剂性结肠。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):283-6. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199806000-00014.
2
Personality characteristics and medical impact of stimulant laxative abuse in eating disorder patients-a pilot study.饮食失调患者滥用刺激性泻药的人格特征及医学影响——一项初步研究
J Eat Disord. 2021 Nov 4;9(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00502-9.
3
The concomitant use of an osmotic laxative, magnesium sulphate, and a stimulant laxative, bisacodyl, does not enhance the laxative effect.同时使用渗透性泻药硫酸镁和刺激性泻药比沙可啶并不会增强通便效果。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012 Jan 23;45(1-2):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
4
Use and abuse of laxatives.泻药的使用与滥用。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Mar;34(3):291-300.
5
Cleansing enema prior to double-contrast barium enema examination: is it necessary?双重对比钡灌肠检查前的清洁灌肠:有必要吗?
Radiology. 1993 Apr;187(1):109-12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.1.8451396.
6
Adverse effects of laxatives.泻药的不良反应。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Aug;44(8):1201-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02234645.
7
Surgical Management of Functional Constipation: Preliminary Report of a New Approach Using a Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection Combined with a Malone Appendicostomy.功能性便秘的手术治疗:一种采用腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术联合马龙阑尾造口术新方法的初步报告
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Aug;27(4):336-340. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593606. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Use of laxatives in institutions for the mentally retarded.在智障机构中使用泻药。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Feb;54(12):965-9. doi: 10.1007/s002280050583.
9
Barium enemas in the frail elderly.老年体弱者的钡灌肠检查
Am J Med. 1992 Jan;92(1):41-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90013-2.
10
Is chronic use of stimulant laxatives harmful to the colon?长期使用刺激性泻药对结肠有害吗?
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 May-Jun;36(5):386-9. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200305000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of elobixibat in patients with chronic constipation-A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study from India.埃洛昔巴特治疗慢性便秘患者的疗效与安全性——一项来自印度的随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun;44(3):336-344. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01719-7. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
2
Review article: do stimulant laxatives damage the gut? A critical analysis of current knowledge.综述文章:刺激性泻药会损害肠道吗?对现有知识的批判性分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 16;17:17562848241249664. doi: 10.1177/17562848241249664. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness and safety of lubiprostone after switching from stimulant laxatives in elderly patients with chronic constipation.
老年慢性便秘患者从刺激性泻药转换为鲁比前列酮后的有效性和安全性。
JGH Open. 2023 Aug 11;7(9):610-617. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12956. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Factors associated with long-term efficacy of lubiprostone for chronic constipation.鲁比前列酮治疗慢性便秘长期疗效的相关因素。
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2023 Jul;73(1):91-96. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.22-24. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
2022 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation.《2022年功能性便秘临床实践指南首尔共识》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jul 30;29(3):271-305. doi: 10.5056/jnm23066.
6
Ischemic Colitis Secondary to Olanzapine and Clonidine Use in a Patient With a History of Laxative Abuse.奥氮平和可乐定联用导致的缺血性结肠炎,见于一名有泻药滥用史的患者。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36605. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36605. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Personality characteristics and medical impact of stimulant laxative abuse in eating disorder patients-a pilot study.饮食失调患者滥用刺激性泻药的人格特征及医学影响——一项初步研究
J Eat Disord. 2021 Nov 4;9(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00502-9.
8
Effect of Court-Type Thai Traditional Massage Versus Senokot Treatment on Chronic Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.庭式泰式传统按摩与 Senokot 治疗对慢性便秘的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2020 Jan-Dec;25:2515690X20960644. doi: 10.1177/2515690X20960644.
9
Acupuncture for Chronic Constipation in Patients with Chronic Disorders of Consciousness After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.针刺治疗重度创伤性脑损伤后慢性意识障碍患者的慢性便秘
Med Acupunct. 2019 Aug 1;31(4):218-223. doi: 10.1089/acu.2019.1361. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
10
Profile of plecanatide in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation: design, development, and place in therapy.普卡那肽治疗慢性特发性便秘的概况:设计、研发及在治疗中的地位
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 22;12:31-36. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S145668. eCollection 2019.