• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice.

作者信息

van As C J, Hilgers F J, Verdonck-de Leeuw I M, Koopmans-van Beinum F

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital), University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Voice. 1998 Jun;12(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80044-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80044-1
PMID:9649080
Abstract

Voice analysis was performed on 21 "standard" laryngectomized, male patients with a Provox voice prosthesis, along with an age- and sex-matched control group of 20 normal speakers, using acoustical analyses (MDVP and CSL, Kay Elemetrics Corp.), maximum phonation time measurements, and perceptual evaluations. Comparison between MDVP and CSL revealed that the latter was not useful for the analysis of laryngectomized prosthetic voices. In contrast, MDVP seems suitable for this purpose, and contains a large number of parameters that significantly differentiate between patient and control speakers, as did the perceptual ratings and the maximum phonation time. Fundamental frequency appeared to be comparable for patients and control speakers. A significant influence of stoma occlusion and age was found for some voice parameters. Factor analyses showed correlations between the different MDVP parameters and correlations between the MDVP parameters and the perceptual ratings.

摘要

相似文献

1
Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice.
J Voice. 1998 Jun;12(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80044-1.
2
The influence of stoma occlusion on aspects of tracheoesophageal voice.造口闭塞对食管气管发音各方面的影响。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1998 Sep;118(5):732-8. doi: 10.1080/00016489850183278.
3
The pharyngoesophageal segment in laryngectomees--videoradiographic, acoustic, and voice quality perceptual data.喉切除患者的咽食管段——视频放射成像、声学及嗓音质量感知数据
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2008;33(3):115-25. doi: 10.1080/14015430701855788.
4
Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.女性气管食管人工发声的多维评估
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Dec;31(6):511-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2006.01290.x.
5
Aerodynamic studies of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.阿松气管食管分流术后喉切除患者的空气动力学研究。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986 Mar-Apr;95(2 Pt 1):181-4. doi: 10.1177/000348948609500215.
6
Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome.气管食管假体声音效果的客观和主观评估。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
7
[Oral communication of laryngectomized patients with tracheoesophageal prosthesis: pre and post-treatment comparative analysis].[喉切除患者使用气管食管假体的口语交流:治疗前后的对比分析]
Pro Fono. 2005 May-Aug;17(2):165-74. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872005000200005.
8
Speech and voice after laryngectomy: perceptual and acoustical analyses of tracheoesophageal speech related to voice handicap index.喉切除术后的言语与嗓音:与嗓音障碍指数相关的食管气管发音的感知与声学分析
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(2):98-108. doi: 10.1159/000319740. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
[Acoustic analysis of tracheoesophageal speech in comparison to esophageal speech after total laryngectomy].[全喉切除术后气管食管语音与食管语音的声学分析比较]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2004;58(3):473-7.
10
The Pharyngoesophageal Segment After Total Laryngectomy.全喉切除术后的下咽食管段
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017 Feb;126(2):138-145. doi: 10.1177/0003489416681321. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture.全喉切除术后采用J型皮瓣和气管食管穿刺进行嗓音恢复的嗓音结果及生活质量综合评估
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;14(3):544. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030544.
2
Chaos Behavior Analysis of Alaryngeal Voices Including Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Voices.人工喉语音的混沌行为分析,包括食管语音和气管食管语音。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(6):431-440. doi: 10.1159/000521222. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
Using Beatboxing for Creative Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: Experiences From a Public Engagement Project.
喉切除术后运用节奏口技进行创造性康复:一个公众参与项目的经验
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 14;10:2854. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02854. eCollection 2019.
4
Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.高清晰度食管气管语音的听者努力程度。
J Commun Disord. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):235-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
5
Voicing quantification is more relevant than period perturbation in substitution voices: an advanced acoustical study.发声量化比替代音的周期扰动更相关:一项先进的声学研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;269(4):1205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1900-8. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
Intensity and fundamental frequency control in tracheoesophageal voice.气管食管语音中的强度和基频控制。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Aug;25(4):240-4.
7
Intelligibility of laryngectomees' substitute speech: automatic speech recognition and subjective rating.喉切除患者替代言语的可懂度:自动语音识别与主观评分
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Feb;263(2):188-93. doi: 10.1007/s00405-005-0974-6. Epub 2005 Jul 7.
8
Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices.替代语音质量的客观评估。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Nov;261(10):541-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0681-0. Epub 2004 Jan 15.