Takumi K, Hogeweg P
Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Theor Biol. 1998 Jun 7;192(3):309-17. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0650.
Repertoire of an immune system is a set of antigen receptors each having a unique specificity to bind an antigen. In many vertebrate species, antigen receptors are produced via combinatorial arrangements of DNA segments in specialized immune cells. Due to this molecular mechanism, repertoire of vertebrate species is potentially very large. The diversity of repertoire is thought to guarantee recognition of most ill-causing micro-organisms. In vertebrate species however, similar editing of DNA segments has not been demonstrated to take place. Immune system of invertebrate species therefore seems to operate in a distinct manner from that of vertebrate species. Using an evolutionary model in which organisms struggle to fight infections, we attempt to understand why some species use a more diverse set of antigen receptors than others. Individuals in our model either use somatic DNA recombination to produce antigen receptors (as in vertebrates) or do not use such a mechanism (as in vertebrates). We found that individuals having an invertebrate-like immune system came to employ only a few antigen receptors to recognize a set of pathogens whereas those with a vertebrate-like immune system use a larger set of more specific antigen receptors to recognize the same set of pathogens. Our interpretation of this finding is that because the genetics of the immune system imposed different constraints on the evolutionary process, two distinct recognition strategies have been adapted by these species.
免疫系统的受体库是一组抗原受体,每个受体对结合抗原都具有独特的特异性。在许多脊椎动物物种中,抗原受体是通过专门免疫细胞中DNA片段的组合排列产生的。由于这种分子机制,脊椎动物物种的受体库可能非常庞大。受体库的多样性被认为能保证识别大多数致病微生物。然而,在脊椎动物物种中,尚未证明会发生类似的DNA片段编辑。因此,无脊椎动物物种的免疫系统似乎以与脊椎动物物种不同的方式运作。利用一种生物为对抗感染而斗争的进化模型,我们试图理解为什么有些物种使用比其他物种更多样化的抗原受体。我们模型中的个体要么使用体细胞DNA重组来产生抗原受体(如脊椎动物那样),要么不使用这种机制(如脊椎动物那样)。我们发现,具有类似无脊椎动物免疫系统的个体只使用少数抗原受体来识别一组病原体,而具有类似脊椎动物免疫系统的个体则使用更多组更特异的抗原受体来识别同一组病原体。我们对这一发现的解释是,由于免疫系统的遗传学在进化过程中施加了不同的限制,这些物种采用了两种不同的识别策略。