De Witte H, Sweep F, Brünner N, Heuvel J, Beex L, Grebenschikov N, Benraad T
Department of Chemical Endocrinology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 1998 Jul 17;77(2):236-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980717)77:2<236::aid-ijc12>3.0.co;2-9.
Complexes between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) were assessed in plasma and serum from 39 breast cancer patients and from 20 healthy individuals, applying a recently developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the analysis of these complexes in tumor tissue extracts. The assay is based on a combination of rabbit polyclonal anti-uPA antibodies for catching and a mouse anti-uPAR monoclonal antibody (MAb) for detection. The specificity of the assessment of uPA:uPAR complexes was verified by simultaneous analysis of the individual blood samples in corresponding non-sense ELISA formats, in which either the anti-uPA catching antibody or the anti-uPAR detecting antibody was substituted with an irrelevant antibody. Assessment of native uPA:uPAR complexes was ascertained by demonstrating the absence of any de novo formation of uPA:uPAR complexes in plasma and serum during the sample incubation step in the ELISA, as verified by the use of a peptide antagonist for uPAR. Plasma and serum samples contained almost identical levels of uPA:uPAR complexes. The levels of uPA:uPAR complexes were found to be significantly lower in serum from breast cancer patients compared to the serum of healthy donors, while the levels of (total) uPAR in plasma from breast cancer patients were significantly higher than in plasma from the healthy controls. In addition, the free, uncomplexed uPAR levels, estimated by subtraction of uPA:uPAR complex levels from (total) uPAR levels, were significantly elevated in plasma as well as in serum from breast cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. The uPA:uPAR complex levels were highly comparable to the uPA levels analyzed in the same plasma and serum samples, indicating that most if not all of the uPA present in these samples is complexed with uPAR.
应用最近开发的酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)分析肿瘤组织提取物中的这些复合物,对39例乳腺癌患者和20名健康个体的血浆和血清中的尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)及其受体(uPAR)之间的复合物进行了评估。该测定法基于兔多克隆抗uPA抗体捕获和小鼠抗uPAR单克隆抗体(MAb)检测的组合。通过以相应的无意义ELISA形式同时分析个体血样来验证uPA:uPAR复合物评估的特异性,其中抗uPA捕获抗体或抗uPAR检测抗体被无关抗体替代。通过在ELISA的样品孵育步骤中证明血浆和血清中不存在uPA:uPAR复合物的任何重新形成来确定天然uPA:uPAR复合物的评估,这通过使用uPAR的肽拮抗剂得到验证。血浆和血清样品中uPA:uPAR复合物的水平几乎相同。发现乳腺癌患者血清中uPA:uPAR复合物的水平明显低于健康供体的血清,而乳腺癌患者血浆中(总)uPAR的水平明显高于健康对照的血浆。此外,通过从(总)uPAR水平中减去uPA:uPAR复合物水平估计的游离、未复合的uPAR水平,在乳腺癌患者的血浆和血清中与健康个体相比也显著升高。uPA:uPAR复合物水平与在相同血浆和血清样品中分析的uPA水平高度可比,表明这些样品中存在的大部分(如果不是全部)uPA与uPAR复合。