Rigonan A S, Mann L, Chonmaitree T
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 77555-0371, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):1877-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1877-1881.1998.
Nonpoliovirus enteroviruses cause a variety of diseases that are common in young children and adults. The "gold standard" for laboratory diagnosis of enteroviruses is cell culture isolation, followed by serotype identification by neutralization assay. These procedures are time-consuming and expensive. Rapid serotype identification of enteroviruses is important in differentiating nonpoliovirus enterovirus pathogens from vaccine strain polioviruses that can be shed for some time after vaccination. In the present investigation, we evaluated a rapid method for serotype identification of enteroviruses by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using commercially available monoclonal antibodies for polioviruses, coxsackieviruses type B, and six serotypes of commonly circulating echoviruses. Of 291 isolates of enteroviruses included in the study, 95 were polioviruses and 196 were nonpoliovirus enteroviruses. Two hundred thirty-four of these (38 polioviruses and 196 nonpoliovirus enteroviruses) were consecutively grown in the laboratory over a 5-year period. IFA identified the serotypes of 74% of the consecutive isolates and 71% of all enterovirus isolates by yielding a positive staining result. The levels of agreement in the identification of the enterovirus group between IFA and neutralization tests were 92% for consecutively grown isolates and 85% for all enterovirus isolates. The sensitivity of the IFA for the detection of viruses for which specific monoclonal antibodies were applied was 73% for polioviruses, 85% for coxsackieviruses type B, and 94% for echoviruses. Specificity was near 100% for polioviruses and coxsackieviruses type B and 94% for echoviruses. We conclude that IFA can be helpful as a preliminary test for serotype identification of enteroviruses. The results are most accurate when the test identifies the isolate as a poliovirus.
非脊髓灰质炎肠道病毒可引发多种疾病,在幼儿和成人中较为常见。肠道病毒实验室诊断的“金标准”是细胞培养分离,随后通过中和试验进行血清型鉴定。这些程序耗时且昂贵。快速鉴定肠道病毒血清型对于区分非脊髓灰质炎肠道病毒病原体与疫苗株脊髓灰质炎病毒很重要,疫苗株脊髓灰质炎病毒在接种疫苗后可能会排出一段时间。在本研究中,我们评估了一种通过间接免疫荧光法(IFA)快速鉴定肠道病毒血清型的方法,该方法使用市售的针对脊髓灰质炎病毒、B组柯萨奇病毒以及六种常见流行的埃可病毒血清型的单克隆抗体。在该研究纳入的291株肠道病毒分离株中,95株为脊髓灰质炎病毒,196株为非脊髓灰质炎肠道病毒。其中234株(38株脊髓灰质炎病毒和196株非脊髓灰质炎肠道病毒)在5年期间在实验室中连续培养。IFA通过产生阳性染色结果鉴定出74%的连续分离株和71%的所有肠道病毒分离株的血清型。IFA与中和试验在鉴定肠道病毒组方面的一致性水平,对于连续培养的分离株为92%,对于所有肠道病毒分离株为85%。IFA对应用了特异性单克隆抗体的病毒检测的敏感性,对于脊髓灰质炎病毒为73%,对于B组柯萨奇病毒为85%,对于埃可病毒为94%。脊髓灰质炎病毒和B组柯萨奇病毒的特异性接近100%,埃可病毒的特异性为94%。我们得出结论,IFA可作为肠道病毒血清型鉴定的初步试验。当该试验将分离株鉴定为脊髓灰质炎病毒时,结果最为准确。