Illarramendi A, González Della Valle A, Segal E, De Carli P, Maignon G, Gallucci G
Institute of Orthopaedics Carlos E. Ottolenghi, Italian Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Int Orthop. 1998;22(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s002640050220.
In order to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the Frykman and AO classifications and their variations between assessors with different levels of experience, three hand specialists, a fellow and two senior residents classified radiographs of 200 fractures of the distal radius in anteroposterior and lateral views. Reproducibility was assessed by the use of the proportion of agreement and kappa coefficient between pairs of observers. The Frykman classification showed moderate interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.43) and good intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.61). The experience of the reviewers did not significantly affect either of these. The AO system showed regular interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.37) and moderate intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.57). The younger group obtained higher intraobserver agreement than the senior. Possible causes for the low reproducibility of both classifications are discussed together with a review of the literature. We do not recommend the Frykman or AO classifications for clinical application because of their questionable reproducibility.
为了评估Frykman分类法和AO分类法在不同经验水平评估者之间的观察者间和观察者内一致性及其差异,三名手部专家、一名住院医师和两名高年资住院医师对200例桡骨远端骨折的前后位和侧位X线片进行了分类。通过使用观察者对之间的一致性比例和kappa系数来评估可重复性。Frykman分类法显示观察者间的可重复性为中等(kappa = 0.43),观察者内的可重复性良好(kappa = 0.61)。评审者的经验对这两者均无显著影响。AO系统显示观察者间的可重复性一般(kappa = 0.37),观察者内的可重复性为中等(kappa = 0.57)。年轻组的观察者内一致性高于年长者。文中讨论了这两种分类法可重复性低的可能原因,并对相关文献进行了综述。由于其可重复性存疑,我们不建议将Frykman分类法或AO分类法用于临床。