Suppr超能文献

桡骨远端骨折简化Frykman和AO分类的评估。观察者间和观察者内一致性的评估。

Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

作者信息

Illarramendi A, González Della Valle A, Segal E, De Carli P, Maignon G, Gallucci G

机构信息

Institute of Orthopaedics Carlos E. Ottolenghi, Italian Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 1998;22(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s002640050220.

Abstract

In order to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the Frykman and AO classifications and their variations between assessors with different levels of experience, three hand specialists, a fellow and two senior residents classified radiographs of 200 fractures of the distal radius in anteroposterior and lateral views. Reproducibility was assessed by the use of the proportion of agreement and kappa coefficient between pairs of observers. The Frykman classification showed moderate interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.43) and good intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.61). The experience of the reviewers did not significantly affect either of these. The AO system showed regular interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.37) and moderate intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.57). The younger group obtained higher intraobserver agreement than the senior. Possible causes for the low reproducibility of both classifications are discussed together with a review of the literature. We do not recommend the Frykman or AO classifications for clinical application because of their questionable reproducibility.

摘要

为了评估Frykman分类法和AO分类法在不同经验水平评估者之间的观察者间和观察者内一致性及其差异,三名手部专家、一名住院医师和两名高年资住院医师对200例桡骨远端骨折的前后位和侧位X线片进行了分类。通过使用观察者对之间的一致性比例和kappa系数来评估可重复性。Frykman分类法显示观察者间的可重复性为中等(kappa = 0.43),观察者内的可重复性良好(kappa = 0.61)。评审者的经验对这两者均无显著影响。AO系统显示观察者间的可重复性一般(kappa = 0.37),观察者内的可重复性为中等(kappa = 0.57)。年轻组的观察者内一致性高于年长者。文中讨论了这两种分类法可重复性低的可能原因,并对相关文献进行了综述。由于其可重复性存疑,我们不建议将Frykman分类法或AO分类法用于临床。

相似文献

3
[Distal radius fractures: consistency of the classifications].
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2004 Jan-Mar;50(1):55-61. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302004000100036.
4
Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
Injury. 2018 Jun;49 Suppl 1:S29-S32. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30299-7.
5
Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2008 May 1;126(3):180-5. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802008000300008.
6
Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons.
Injury. 2007 Nov;38(11):1268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.03.032. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
9
Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
Orthopedics. 2010 Nov 2;33(11):801. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100924-14.
10
Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(3):153-7. doi: 10.3944/aott.2013.3038.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Reproducibility and Agreement of the IDEAL Classification for Distal Radius Fractures.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 21;59(6):e901-e906. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792121. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Long-term outcome for patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plates versus percutaneous wires.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0307763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307763. eCollection 2024.
3
Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 27;14(1):9673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60416-9.
4
Trends in the Utilization of Computed Tomography in Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 May 9;5(5):638-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.04.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
MDCT evaluation of distal radius fractures and their association with carpal and distal ulnar fractures.
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Oct;30(5):629-635. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02169-y. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
7
Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 26;22(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04473-5.
8
Computer-Aided Assessment of Displacement and Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 18;11(4):719. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040719.
9
The Treatment Method and Results of Percutaneous Pinning and Dynamic External Fixator Application for Unstable Distal Radius Fractures.
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2018 Sep 27;52(3):173-178. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.07078. eCollection 2018.
10
Reliability of the pronator quadratus fat pad sign to predict the severity of distal radius fractures.
World J Radiol. 2017 Sep 28;9(9):359-364. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i9.359.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验