Maynard Smith J
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Novartis Found Symp. 1998;213:203-11; discussion 211-7.
Darwin's idea of evolution by natural selection is almost universally accepted by biologists, but debate continues about the units of selection. The history of this debate starts with Wynne-Edwards' arguments for group selection, and Hamilton's explantation of social behaviour in terms of the inclusive fitness of individuals. Hamilton's approach differs from the gene-centred approach pioneered by Williams and Dawkins, although both the problem and its solution are essentially the same. The choice of approach depends on conceptual and mathematical simplicity, and on one's attitude to the causal efficacy of genes. The problem of selection on units above the species level is discussed. Today, we are in the main concerned with cases in which selection acts simultaneously at two levels. This is true of current research on intragenomic conflict and of the suggestion by Maynard Smith and Szathmáry that in the major transitions in evolution, entities that were capable of independent replication before the transition can only replicate as part of a larger whole after it.
达尔文的自然选择进化论观点几乎被生物学家普遍接受,但关于选择的单位仍存在争议。这场争论的历史始于 Wynne - Edwards 关于群体选择的论点,以及汉密尔顿从个体的广义适合度角度对社会行为的解释。汉密尔顿的方法与威廉姆斯和道金斯开创的以基因为中心的方法不同,尽管问题及其解决方案本质上是相同的。方法的选择取决于概念和数学上的简洁性,以及个人对基因因果效力的态度。讨论了物种水平以上单位的选择问题。如今,我们主要关注选择在两个层面同时起作用的情况。当前关于基因组内冲突的研究以及梅纳德·史密斯和萨瑟马里提出的观点就是如此,他们认为在进化的主要转变中,在转变之前能够独立复制的实体在转变之后只能作为更大整体的一部分进行复制。