Foster W G
Growth and Development Section, Environmental & Occupational Toxicology Division, Bureau of Chemical Hazards, Health Protection Branch, Health Canada.
Can J Public Health. 1998 May-Jun;89 Suppl 1:S37-41, S52, S41-6.
Reports of decreased semen quality and increased rates of developmental abnormalities of the male reproductive tract along with increasing incidence of testicular cancer have focused attention on man-made chemicals as potential causative factors. A biologically plausible hypothesis has been advanced which suggests that man-made chemicals act as endocrine disruptors through interaction with the estrogen receptor resulting in altered development of the reproductive tract. Available evidence suggests that this mechanism may play only a minor role in the purported adverse effects described to date. Man-made chemicals, however, may induce adverse health effects through mechanisms independent of the estrogen receptor. Indeed, man-made chemicals have been shown to induce adverse effects on thyroid function and androgen-dependent processes in animal studies. Hence the focus on estrogenic mimics may be too simplistic and alternate mechanisms could be more relevant due to target gland exposure levels and potency of the toxicant. Before it can be concluded that man-made chemicals pose little or no risk to the development of the reproductive tract in the fetus and children it will be necessary to, at the very least, insure that: 1) exposure scenarios include the most sensitive developmental stage, 2) all endocrine targets have been evaluated for potential effects, and 3) the role of environmentally and biologically relevant levels of chemical mixtures in adverse health outcomes have been evaluated. Due to potential for exposure, sensitivity of the developing reproductive tract, suggestive evidence of a possible role of man-made chemicals in developmental abnormalities of the reproductive tract, and the many outstanding research questions, it is concluded that there is sufficient cause for concern.
精液质量下降、男性生殖道发育异常发生率上升以及睾丸癌发病率不断增加的报告,已将人们的注意力集中在人造化学物质上,认为它们可能是致病因素。一种具有生物学合理性的假说被提出,即人造化学物质通过与雌激素受体相互作用,作为内分泌干扰物,导致生殖道发育改变。现有证据表明,这种机制在迄今为止所描述的所谓不良影响中可能只起次要作用。然而,人造化学物质可能通过独立于雌激素受体的机制对健康产生不良影响。事实上,在动物研究中,人造化学物质已被证明会对甲状腺功能和雄激素依赖过程产生不良影响。因此,对雌激素模拟物的关注可能过于简单化,由于靶腺暴露水平和毒物的效力,其他机制可能更相关。在得出人造化学物质对胎儿和儿童生殖道发育几乎没有或没有风险的结论之前,至少有必要确保:1)暴露情况包括最敏感的发育阶段;2)已评估所有内分泌靶标的潜在影响;3)已评估环境和生物相关水平的化学混合物在不良健康结果中的作用。由于存在暴露可能性、发育中的生殖道敏感性、人造化学物质在生殖道发育异常中可能起作用的暗示性证据以及许多未解决的研究问题,得出的结论是,有充分理由令人担忧。