Wermert D, Marquette C H, Copin M C, Wallet F, Fraticelli A, Ramon P, Tonnel A B
Département de Pneumologie, Service d'Anatomopathologie, and Service de Bactériologie et Hygiène, Hôpital A. Calmette, CHRU de Lille, 59 037 Lillie cedex, France.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;158(1):139-47. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.1.9710061.
We investigated the influence of pulmonary bacteriology and histology on the yield of diagnostic procedures in a clinically relevant model of ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP). Twenty-seven piglets entered a 4-d protocol of ventilatory support under general anesthesia. Endotracheal aspirates (EA), protected specimen brush (PSB), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were obtained on Day 4. PSB and BAL were performed under bronchoscopic guidance in dependent and nondependent lung segments. Immediately thereafter sternotomy allowed bilateral lung biopsies including the segments studied by bronchoscopic techniques. All respiratory specimens were then processed for microscopic examination and quantitative cultures (QC). In this model where many of the confounding factors often present in human studies were absent, we found that (1) although the local bacterial burden tended to correlate with the presence and the severity of histologic lesions, no definite bacteriologic cutoff could differentiate the histologic presence or absence of pneumonia; (2) histologic lesions of pneumonia and parenchymal bacterial burden were unevenly distributed through the lungs; (3) this heterogeneity in bacterial distribution also held true for single bacterial species; (4) using discriminative values of >= 10(3) cfu/ml, >= 10(4) cfu/ml, and >= 10(5) cfu/ml to define positive PSB, BAL, and EA cultures, respectively, these techniques identified the histologic presence of pneumonia with a sensitivity of 69%, 78%, and 100%, respectively; (5) the specificity of these techniques in recognizing VAP was less than 50%; (6) with these discriminative values, less than 50% of PSB and BAL specimens correctly identified the causative organisms, whereas 94% of EA specimens correctly established the microbiologic diagnosis of pneumonia. We believe that the peculiar histologic and bacteriologic features of VAP may account for the difficulties of PSB and BAL, which combine QC with the use of discriminative thresholds, to reliably recognize pneumonia and to identify the causative organisms. For clinical practice, no technique confidently helps in recognizing pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. With regard to bacterial diagnosis, use of quantitative cultures of EA seems to be the best technique to identify the causative organisms in patients suffering VAP.
我们在呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的临床相关模型中,研究了肺部细菌学和组织学对诊断程序结果的影响。27只仔猪在全身麻醉下进入为期4天的通气支持方案。在第4天获取气管内吸出物(EA)、防污染样本毛刷(PSB)和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本。PSB和BAL在支气管镜引导下于下垂肺段和非下垂肺段进行。此后立即进行胸骨切开术,获取双侧肺活检样本,包括通过支气管镜技术研究的肺段。然后对所有呼吸道样本进行显微镜检查和定量培养(QC)。在这个不存在许多人类研究中常见混杂因素的模型中,我们发现:(1)尽管局部细菌负荷往往与组织学病变的存在和严重程度相关,但没有明确的细菌学临界值能够区分组织学上肺炎的存在与否;(2)肺炎的组织学病变和实质细菌负荷在肺内分布不均;(3)这种细菌分布的异质性对于单一细菌种类也成立;(4)分别使用≥10³cfu/ml、≥10⁴cfu/ml和≥10⁵cfu/ml的判别值来定义PSB、BAL和EA培养阳性,这些技术识别肺炎组织学存在的敏感性分别为69%、78%和100%;(5)这些技术在识别VAP方面的特异性低于50%;(6)采用这些判别值时,不到50%的PSB和BAL样本能正确识别病原体,而94%的EA样本能正确确立肺炎的微生物学诊断。我们认为,VAP独特的组织学和细菌学特征可能是PSB和BAL(将QC与判别阈值结合使用)在可靠识别肺炎和鉴定病原体方面存在困难的原因。对于临床实践而言,没有哪种技术能确切地帮助识别机械通气患者的肺炎。就细菌学诊断而言,使用EA的定量培养似乎是识别VAP患者病原体的最佳技术。