Lewis M M, Watts V J, Lawler C P, Nichols D E, Mailman R B
UNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Jul;286(1):345-53.
The role of drug efficacy in agonist-induced desensitization was studied in C-6 glioma cells transfected with the monkey dopamine D1A (mD1A) receptor. Dopamine pretreatment for 2 hr produced greater than 80% loss of responsiveness in the stimulation of cAMP accumulation that was blocked by the D1 antagonist SCH23390. A series of full and partial D1 agonists from structurally dissimilar classes were then examined. Three full agonists (dihydrexidine, SKF82958, A77636) desensitized the receptor to the same extent as dopamine, whereas two other full agonists (dinapsoline and A68930) and all the partial agonists tested (SKF38393, pergolide and d-lysergic acid diethylamide tartrate) produced only partial desensitization (i.e., 50% that of dopamine). Whereas partial agonists (i.e., SKF38393, pergolide and d-lysergic acid diethylamide tartrate) caused no alteration in ligand-accessible mD1A receptors, four of the full agonists (dopamine, dihydrexidine, dinapsoline, A68930) caused a 30 to 40% reduction in receptor number. One full agonist, A77636, caused nearly an 80% decrease in receptor number, despite the fact that the degree of functional desensitization was similar to the other full agonists. The desensitization of the D1 receptor was homologous, not affecting beta-2 adrenergic receptors endogenous to C-6 cells. Neither incubation with cAMP analogs, nor inhibition of protein kinase A, affected dopamine-induced desensitization, suggesting a cAMP-independent mechanism in this cell line. Together, these data suggest that functional desensitization of the mD1A receptor expressed in C-6 glioma cells is a cAMP-independent mechanism, cannot be predicted reliably from agonist efficacy for stimulating adenylate cyclase and can occur in the absence of changes in receptor number.
在转染了猴多巴胺D1A(mD1A)受体的C-6胶质瘤细胞中研究了药物疗效在激动剂诱导的脱敏中的作用。多巴胺预处理2小时导致cAMP积累刺激反应性丧失超过80%,该反应被D1拮抗剂SCH23390阻断。然后检测了一系列结构不同类别的完全和部分D1激动剂。三种完全激动剂(二氢麦角隐亭、SKF82958、A77636)使受体脱敏的程度与多巴胺相同,而另外两种完全激动剂(地那索林和A68930)以及所有测试的部分激动剂(SKF38393、培高利特和酒石酸麦角酰二乙胺)仅产生部分脱敏(即多巴胺的50%)。部分激动剂(即SKF38393、培高利特和酒石酸麦角酰二乙胺)未引起配体可及的mD1A受体改变,而四种完全激动剂(多巴胺、二氢麦角隐亭、地那索林、A68930)使受体数量减少30%至40%。一种完全激动剂A77636使受体数量减少近80%,尽管功能脱敏程度与其他完全激动剂相似。D1受体的脱敏是同源的,不影响C-6细胞内源性的β-2肾上腺素能受体。与cAMP类似物孵育或抑制蛋白激酶A均不影响多巴胺诱导的脱敏,提示该细胞系中存在cAMP非依赖机制。总之,这些数据表明,C-6胶质瘤细胞中表达的mD1A受体的功能脱敏是一种cAMP非依赖机制,不能根据激动剂刺激腺苷酸环化酶的疗效可靠预测,且可在受体数量无变化的情况下发生。