Heymann H O, Swift E J, Bayne S C, May K N, Wilder A D, Mann G B, Peterson C A
Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Apr;19(4):359-62, 364-6, 369 passim; quiz 376.
A blinded study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dentist-prescribed, accelerated carbamide peroxide tooth-whitening system. Fifty-one patients with discolored teeth completed a clinical trial using an overnight bleaching regimen. One group used an experimental bleaching (whitening) regimen with 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching paste, and another group used the Colgate Platinum Professional Overnight Whitening System. The study included an initial 1-week control/compliance phase using a placebo gel, followed by a 1-week active phase using the assigned bleaching agent. The shade of each participant's maxillary anterior teeth was evaluated by 2 trained and calibrated evaluators at the start of the control/compliance phase, the beginning of the active phase, and days 3, 5, and 7 of the active phase. A value-oriented Vita shade guide with 16 rankings was used to measure color changes, and the number of shade guide units of change (delta sgu) was calculated. Potential side effects, such as tooth hypersensitivity and gingival irritation, also were assessed at each recall examination, as well as recorded by the patients in their daily diaries. At the end of the 7-day active phase, the mean delta sgu for the group using the experimental bleaching agent was 7.1 +/- 2.4, and for the Colgate Platinum Overnight group, the delta sgu was 7.5 +/- 2.2. There were no statistically significant (p > or = 0.05) differences between the results of both groups at the 0-, 3-, 5-, and 7-day evaluations. After 7 days, the change in shade guide units for both groups ranged from 3 to 13 units, far exceeding the minimum required change by the American Dental Association Guidelines (delta sgu = 2 units) for demonstrating efficacy. There was no statistical difference in the whitening achieved at day 5 vs. day 7 for either tooth-whitening group. There were no notable changes in any gingival, bleeding, or plaque indexes for the 50 patients completing the active phase. The number of days of mild tooth sensitivity during the active phase was 0.9 +/- 1.3 days for the experimental agent group and 1.1 +/- 1.5 days for the Colgate Platinum group.
开展了一项双盲研究,以评估牙医开具的加速过氧化脲牙齿美白系统的疗效和安全性。51名牙齿变色患者完成了一项使用夜间漂白方案的临床试验。一组使用含10%过氧化脲漂白膏的实验性漂白(美白)方案,另一组使用高露洁铂金装专业夜间美白系统。该研究包括使用安慰剂凝胶的初始1周对照/依从性阶段,随后是使用指定漂白剂的1周活性阶段。在对照/依从性阶段开始时、活性阶段开始时以及活性阶段的第3、5和7天,由2名经过培训和校准的评估人员评估每位参与者上颌前牙的色度。使用具有16个等级的面向数值的Vita比色板来测量颜色变化,并计算比色板单位变化数(δsgu)。在每次复诊检查时还评估了潜在的副作用,如牙齿过敏和牙龈刺激,并由患者记录在他们的日常日记中。在7天活性阶段结束时,使用实验性漂白剂组的平均δsgu为7.1±2.4,高露洁铂金装夜间美白组的δsgu为7.5±2.2。在第0、3、5和7天的评估中,两组结果之间无统计学显著差异(p≥0.05)。7天后,两组的比色板单位变化范围为3至13个单位,远远超过美国牙科协会指南规定的证明疗效所需的最小变化(δsgu = 2个单位)。对于任何一个牙齿美白组,第5天和第7天实现的美白效果均无统计学差异。在完成活性阶段的50名患者中,牙龈、出血或菌斑指数均无明显变化。活性阶段轻度牙齿敏感的天数,实验剂组为0.9±1.3天,高露洁铂金装组为1.1±1.5天。