• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有或无既往机动车事故史的颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的比较:治疗与结果

A comparison of TMD patients with or without prior motor vehicle accident involvement: treatment and outcomes.

作者信息

Kolbinson D A, Epstein J B, Senthilselvan A, Burgess J A

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, Canada.

出版信息

J Orofac Pain. 1997 Fall;11(4):337-45.

PMID:9656910
Abstract

The influence of previous trauma in the management of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is controversial. The objectives of this study were to compare treatment regimens and outcomes in motor vehicle accident trauma-related versus nontrauma-related TMD patients. Files of 50 trauma and 50 matched nontrauma TMD patients were reviewed. Information concerning treatment received, progress of symptoms with treatment, and findings from the final examination were recorded. As a whole group, posttraumatic TMD patients tended to receive more types of treatment (P < .0001), have more medications prescribed (including analgesics, P < .001; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, P = .001; muscle relaxants, P = .001; and tricyclic antidepressants, P < .001), have more oral medicine clinic visits (P = .07) over a longer period of time (P = .06), and have a poorer treatment outcome (P < .001) as compared to the nontrauma group. When the patients were separated into TMD diagnostic classification subsets, only some of these differences between trauma and nontrauma patients were seen, but the subset group sizes were small and only a few of the groups could be compared. There did not seem to be a significant effect from settling insurance claims prior to the last clinic visit. Trauma may be an important prognostic factor in the management of some TMD patients.

摘要

既往创伤对颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者治疗的影响存在争议。本研究的目的是比较机动车事故创伤相关与非创伤相关TMD患者的治疗方案和治疗结果。回顾了50例创伤性TMD患者和50例匹配的非创伤性TMD患者的病历。记录了所接受治疗的相关信息、治疗过程中症状的进展以及最终检查的结果。作为一个整体组,创伤后TMD患者倾向于接受更多类型的治疗(P <.0001),开具更多种类的药物(包括镇痛药,P <.001;非甾体抗炎药,P =.001;肌肉松弛剂,P =.001;三环类抗抑郁药,P <.001),在更长的时间内有更多的口腔门诊就诊次数(P =.07)(P =.06),并且与非创伤组相比治疗效果更差(P <.001)。当将患者分为TMD诊断分类亚组时,创伤患者与非创伤患者之间仅出现了部分上述差异,但亚组样本量较小,且仅有少数几组可以进行比较。在上次门诊就诊前解决保险理赔似乎没有显著影响。创伤可能是某些TMD患者治疗中的一个重要预后因素。

相似文献

1
A comparison of TMD patients with or without prior motor vehicle accident involvement: treatment and outcomes.有或无既往机动车事故史的颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的比较:治疗与结果
J Orofac Pain. 1997 Fall;11(4):337-45.
2
A comparison of TMD patients with or without prior motor vehicle accident involvement: initial signs, symptoms, and diagnostic characteristics.
J Orofac Pain. 1997 Summer;11(3):206-14.
3
Pharmacologic considerations in the management of temporomandibular disorders.颞下颌关节紊乱病管理中的药理学考量
J Can Dent Assoc. 1995 Feb;61(2):105-9, 112-4.
4
Individual prediction of treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A quality improvement model.颞下颌关节紊乱病患者治疗结果的个体预测。一种质量改进模型。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2007(186):8-42, 1p preceding table of contents.
5
Comparison between predicted and actual treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders treated by TMD-trained general dental practitioners.
Swed Dent J. 2003;27(3):131-41.
6
Temporomandibular disorders after whiplash injury: a controlled, prospective study.挥鞭样损伤后颞下颌关节紊乱症:一项对照性前瞻性研究。
J Orofac Pain. 2002 Spring;16(2):118-28.
7
Comparison of individual prediction of treatment outcome made by a TMD specialist and a TMD-trained general dental practitioner in patients with temporomandibular disorders.颞下颌关节紊乱症患者中,颞下颌关节紊乱症专科医生与接受过颞下颌关节紊乱症培训的普通牙科医生对治疗结果的个体预测比较。
Swed Dent J. 2007;31(2):55-63.
8
Trauma in patients with temporomandibular disorders: frequency and treatment outcome.颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的创伤:发生率及治疗结果
J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Feb;23(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01215.x.
9
Predicting the outcome of a physical medicine treatment for temporomandibular disorder patients.预测颞下颌关节紊乱症患者物理医学治疗的结果。
J Orofac Pain. 2009 Summer;23(3):221-9.
10
Long-term effect on tinnitus by treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a two-year follow-up by questionnaire.颞下颌关节紊乱症治疗对耳鸣的长期影响:一项为期两年的问卷调查随访研究
Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Apr;64(2):89-96. doi: 10.1080/00016350500377842.

引用本文的文献

1
When trauma bites back: a systematic review on direct orofacial macrotrauma and temporomandibular disorders.当创伤反噬:关于直接口腔颌面部大创伤与颞下颌关节紊乱病的系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06095-2.
2
Cranio-Mandibular Disorders after Whiplash Injury: A Mono-Institutional Clinical Study on 31 Patients.挥鞭样损伤后颅颌面部紊乱:31 例单机构临床研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020901.
3
Incident injury is strongly associated with subsequent incident temporomandibular disorder: results from the OPPERA study.
事件性损伤与随后发生的颞下颌关节紊乱病有很强的相关性:来自 OPPERA 研究的结果。
Pain. 2019 Jul;160(7):1551-1561. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001554.
4
Clinical findings and pain symptoms as potential risk factors for chronic TMD: descriptive data and empirically identified domains from the OPPERA case-control study.临床发现和疼痛症状作为慢性 TMD 的潜在风险因素:来自 OPPERA 病例对照研究的描述性数据和经验识别的领域。
J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11 Suppl):T27-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.09.001.