• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的手术绝育:1965 - 1995年的流行情况及特征

Surgical sterilization in the United States: prevalence and characteristics, 1965-95.

作者信息

Chandra A

出版信息

Vital Health Stat 23. 1998 Jun(20):1-33.

PMID:9658983
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This report presents national data on the prevalence of surgical sterilization from 1965 to 1995 among women 15-44 years of age. Data are shown by type of sterilizing operation and demographic characteristics of the women. For the 1995 survey data, reasons for the three most common sterilizing operations (tubal ligation, vasectomy, and hysterectomy) are shown, as well as the desire for reversal among those with potentially reversible operations.

METHODS

Data are based on nationally representative samples of women 15-44 years of age: the 1965 National Fertility Study (NFS), and the 1973, 1982, 1988, and 1995 cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).

RESULTS

After rising from 16 to 42 percent between 1965 and 1988, the prevalence of surgical sterilization among married women 15-44 years old remained stable at 41 percent in 1995. Age, parity, religious affiliation, and education continued to be strongly associated with overall surgical sterilization levels. Tubal ligation and vasectomy were equally prevalent in the 1965 and 1973 surveys, but since 1962, tubal ligation has been more prevalent than vasectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors contributed to the rise in reliance upon surgical sterilization among women 15-44 years old over the last 3 decades: (a) aging of the post-World War II Baby Boom women (and their partners) through the primary reproductive years; (b) relatively high contraceptive failure rates, particularly among socioeconomically less advantaged women; and (c) higher expectations for contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and convenience. Overall sterilization prevalence may be leveling off among women 15-44 years old, in part due to greater delay of first and subsequent births, thus making sterilization less of a concern while women are in this age range.

摘要

目标

本报告呈现了1965年至1995年15至44岁女性中手术绝育流行率的全国数据。数据按绝育手术类型及女性人口特征展示。对于1995年的调查数据,列出了三种最常见绝育手术(输卵管结扎、输精管切除术和子宫切除术)的原因,以及接受可能可逆手术者的复通意愿。

方法

数据基于15至44岁女性具有全国代表性的样本:1965年全国生育研究(NFS),以及1973年、1982年、1988年和1995年全国家庭成长调查(NSFG)周期的数据。

结果

1965年至1988年间,15至44岁已婚女性的手术绝育流行率从16%升至42%,1995年保持稳定在41%。年龄、胎次、宗教信仰和教育程度继续与总体手术绝育水平密切相关。输卵管结扎和输精管切除术在1965年和1973年的调查中同样普遍,但自1962年以来,输卵管结扎比输精管切除术更普遍。

结论

过去三十年里,有几个因素导致15至44岁女性对手术绝育的依赖增加:(a)二战后婴儿潮一代女性(及其伴侣)度过主要生育年龄;(b)避孕失败率相对较高,尤其是在社会经济地位较低的女性中;(c)对避孕有效性、安全性和便利性的期望更高。15至44岁女性的总体绝育流行率可能趋于平稳,部分原因是首次生育和后续生育的延迟增加,因此在这个年龄段女性中,绝育不再那么受关注。

相似文献

1
Surgical sterilization in the United States: prevalence and characteristics, 1965-95.美国的手术绝育:1965 - 1995年的流行情况及特征
Vital Health Stat 23. 1998 Jun(20):1-33.
2
[Contraceptive practice in Mexico: two five-year periods, two different patterns (1976-1977 to 1987)].[墨西哥的避孕措施:两个五年期,两种不同模式(1976 - 1977年至1987年)]
Estud Demogr Urbanos Col Mex. 1990 Sep-Dec;5(3):535-67, 823-4.
3
Sterilization regret among U.S. couples.美国夫妇中的绝育后悔情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Sep-Oct;18(5):238-40.
4
[Vasectomy and tubal ligation: medicopsychological aspects of voluntary sterilization].[输精管切除术和输卵管结扎术:自愿绝育的医学心理学方面]
Psychol Med (Paris). 1982 Jun;14(8):1195-201.
5
[Rendering follicle tubes permeable again after post-partum sterilization. A report on 25 cases. Should post-partum sterilization be performed or not?].[产后绝育后使滤泡管再次通透。25例报告。产后是否应进行绝育?]
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1986 Jul-Aug;14(7-8):675-81.
6
Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995.美国1982 - 1995年生育力受损情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):34-42.
7
Sociocultural factors associated with contraceptive use in Puerto Rico.与波多黎各避孕措施使用相关的社会文化因素。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1987;21(4):395-404.
8
Age differences between sexual partners in the United States.美国性伴侣之间的年龄差异。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jul-Aug;31(4):160-7.
9
Survey report: Pakistan.调查报告:巴基斯坦。
Popul Today. 1991 Oct;19(10):5.
10
Factors affecting the use and non use of contraception.影响避孕措施使用与否的因素。
Majalah Demografi Indones. 1983 Dec;10(20):ii-19-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty in Postpartum Permanent Contraception Decision-Making: Physician and Patient Perspectives.产后永久性避孕决策中的不确定性:医生和患者的观点。
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Nov-Dec;34(6):572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
Women's Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Birth Timing and Birth Stopping.女性使用长效可逆避孕措施来控制生育时间和终止妊娠。
Demography. 2021 Aug 1;58(4):1327-1346. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9386084.
3
Changing Educational Differentials in Female Sterilization.女性绝育教育差异的变化。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):117-127. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12137. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Understanding Sterilization Regret in the United States: The Role of Relationship Context.了解美国的绝育后悔情绪:关系背景的作用。
J Marriage Fam. 2018 Oct;80(5):1259-1270. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12500. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
Desire for Sterilization Reversal Among U.S. Females: Increasing Inequalities by Educational Level.美国女性对绝育手术逆转的渴望:受教育程度不平等加剧。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;50(3):139-145. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12076. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Contraceptive Sterilization: Introducing A Couple Perspective to Examine Sociodemographic Differences in Use.避孕绝育:从夫妻视角探讨使用方面的社会人口学差异
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Sep;49(3):173-180. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12033. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
"Research on Infertility: Definition Makes a Difference" Revisited.不孕研究:定义的差异
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;187(2):337-346. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx240.
8
Effectiveness of bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient population.双侧输卵管吻合术在大量门诊患者中的有效性。
Hum Reprod. 2016 May;31(5):1120-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew038. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
9
The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.十个低生育率国家中避孕绝育与(不)利因素之间令人困惑的联系。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2016;70(1):39-58. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1122209. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Relationships of Tubal Ligation to Endometrial Carcinoma Stage and Mortality in the NRG Oncology/ Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Trial.NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组 210 试验中输卵管结扎术与子宫内膜癌分期和死亡率的关系。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jun 18;107(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv158. Print 2015 Sep.