Suppr超能文献

停用锂盐及后续疗效。

Lithium discontinuation and subsequent effectiveness.

作者信息

Coryell W, Solomon D, Leon A C, Akiskal H S, Keller M B, Scheftner W A, Mueller T

机构信息

University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242-1000, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;155(7):895-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.7.895.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several reports have raised concern that the discontinuation of lithium may result in treatment resistance following recurrence of affective disorder. This report explores this possibility.

METHOD

The data derive from a large, naturalistic follow-up of patients with major depressive disorder or mania. Twenty-eight of the patients in the study were free of lithium and experiencing an episode of mania or schizoaffective mania diagnosed according to Research Diagnostic Criteria when they entered the study, recovered while taking lithium, later experienced a recurrence while not taking lithium, and then resumed lithium treatment. Survival analyses of time to recovery and, subsequently, time to recurrence, used continued lithium treatment as an additional censoring variable.

RESULTS

Patients given lithium recovered no more quickly from their index episode than they did from their first prospectively observed episode. Moreover, lithium prophylaxis appeared no less effective after the first prospectively observed episode than after the index episode.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide no evidence that lithium discontinuation results in treatment resistance when lithium is resumed.

摘要

目的

有几份报告引发了人们对停用锂盐可能导致情感障碍复发后出现治疗抵抗的担忧。本报告探讨了这种可能性。

方法

数据来源于对重度抑郁症或躁狂症患者的一项大型自然随访研究。研究中的28名患者在进入研究时未服用锂盐,且正经历一次根据研究诊断标准诊断的躁狂发作或分裂情感性躁狂发作,他们在服用锂盐时康复,之后在未服用锂盐时复发,然后重新开始锂盐治疗。对康复时间以及随后复发时间的生存分析将持续锂盐治疗作为一个额外的删失变量。

结果

服用锂盐的患者从首次发作中恢复的速度并不比从首次前瞻性观察到的发作中恢复得更快。此外,锂盐预防性治疗在首次前瞻性观察到的发作后似乎并不比在首次发作后效果差。

结论

这些发现没有提供证据表明重新服用锂盐时停用锂盐会导致治疗抵抗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验