Rosenblatt W H, Wagner P J, Ovassapian A, Kain Z N
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Jul;87(1):153-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199807000-00032.
Despite the availability of several techniques and devices for the management of the difficult airway, little information has been published regarding the prevalence of their use by anesthesiologists in the United States. To determine current practice patterns, we surveyed clinicians using a questionnaire consisting of 14 difficult airway scenarios. Anesthesiologists were requested to indicate their likely approach to anesthetic induction (e.g., awake but sedated, general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation, general anesthesia with apnea after assuring a patent airway, or general anesthesia with apnea) and the primary device they would use to intubate (e.g., direct laryngoscopy [DL], flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope [FOB], rigid fiberoptic device, surgical airway, retrograde intubation kit, laryngeal mask airway, gum elastic bougie, or Combitube). The availability of these devices was also determined (in room at all times, available "stat," available if arranged preoperatively, or not available). The survey was mailed to 1000 randomly chosen active members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Second and third surveys were mailed to non responders. Four hundred seventy-two completed surveys were returned. Responses by demographic groups were compared by using chi 2 analysis. DL and FOB-aided tracheal intubation techniques were chosen for most cases by most anesthesiologists (P < 0.05). Anesthesiologists with > 10 yr of clinical experience and those older than 55 yr of age preferred DL with apneic conditions (P < 0.05). Anesthesiologists who had attended workshops within the last 5 yr had greater availability of retrograde guidewire equipment and FOBs (P < 0.05). There was little use of newer alternative airway devices.
Although the teaching of alternative methods of securing a difficult airway has become ubiquitous, most anesthesiologists rely on direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic-aided intubation in most clinical circumstances. Although workshops in the management of the difficult airway may have resulted in increased use of the fiberoptic bronchoscope and the availability of retrograde guidewire intubation equipment, other devices have not enjoyed such an increase.
尽管有多种技术和设备可用于处理困难气道,但关于美国麻醉医生使用这些技术和设备的普遍性,相关报道却很少。为了确定当前的实践模式,我们使用一份包含14种困难气道场景的问卷对临床医生进行了调查。要求麻醉医生指出他们可能的麻醉诱导方法(例如,清醒但镇静、自主通气的全身麻醉、确保气道通畅后无呼吸的全身麻醉或无呼吸的全身麻醉)以及他们用于插管的主要设备(例如,直接喉镜检查[DL]、可弯曲纤维支气管镜[FOB]、硬式纤维光学设备、手术气道、逆行插管套件、喉罩气道、弹性橡胶探条或联合导管)。还确定了这些设备的可获取性(随时在房间内、“立即”可用、术前安排后可用或不可用)。该调查问卷被邮寄给1000名随机挑选的美国麻醉医师协会活跃会员。第二份和第三份调查问卷被邮寄给未回复者。共收到472份完整的调查问卷。使用卡方分析比较不同人口统计学组的回复。大多数麻醉医生在大多数情况下选择DL和FOB辅助气管插管技术(P<0.05)。具有超过10年临床经验的麻醉医生和年龄超过55岁的麻醉医生在无呼吸情况下更喜欢DL(P<0.05)。在过去5年内参加过研讨会的麻醉医生,逆行导丝设备和FOB的可获取性更高(P<0.05)。新型替代气道设备的使用很少。
尽管确保困难气道的替代方法的教学已很普遍,但大多数麻醉医生在大多数临床情况下仍依赖直接喉镜检查和纤维光学辅助插管。尽管困难气道管理研讨会可能导致纤维支气管镜的使用增加以及逆行导丝插管设备的可获取性提高,但其他设备并未有如此增长。