Tiwari Tanmay, Walian Ashish, Singh Vipin Kumar, Singh Vinita, Chakraborty Sangeeta, Rawat Amber
Department of Anesthesia and critical care, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Retrograde intubation is one of the well-described and alternative methods of difficult airway management. It requires effective sedation and patient preparation. Study was done to evaluate intubating conditions during retrograde guided intubation with two different doses of dexmedetomidine.
This prospective randomized double blind parallel group trial was planned on 60 patients with difficult airway. Patients were divided in two groups to receive either dexmedetomidine 1.0 μg/kg (Group A) or dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg (Group B) by intravenous (IV) route. The Modified Observer Assessment Awareness and Sedation (OAA/S) was measured as primary outcome and ease of intubation, facial grimace score, cough severity, hemodynamic response, patient recall and discomfort were assessed as secondary outcome during awake retrograde intubation.
Groups were comparable in terms of demographic and baseline parameters. OAA/S (P = 0.001), cough severity (P < 0.001), facial grimace score (P < 0.001), grading of discomfort during procedure (P < 0.001) and recall of procedure scale (P = 0.038) were found significantly better/lower in Group B as compared to Group A. Hemodynamic parameters were better in Group B and showed significant difference during the retrograde intubation. However, ease of intubation scale, intubating time and complications were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the two groups.
Retrograde intubation can be easily learned and performed with minimal complications. Dexmedetomidine in a dose of 1.5 μg/kg IV is optimum and safe for retrograde intubation with clinically manageable side effects.
逆行插管是困难气道管理中一种已被充分描述的替代方法。它需要有效的镇静和患者准备。本研究旨在评估两种不同剂量右美托咪定用于逆行引导插管时的插管条件。
本前瞻性随机双盲平行组试验纳入60例困难气道患者。患者分为两组,分别通过静脉途径接受1.0μg/kg右美托咪定(A组)或1.5μg/kg右美托咪定(B组)。主要观察指标为改良的观察者镇静与意识评估(OAA/S),次要观察指标为清醒逆行插管期间的插管难易程度、面部 grimace 评分、咳嗽严重程度、血流动力学反应、患者回忆及不适感。
两组在人口统计学和基线参数方面具有可比性。与A组相比,B组的OAA/S(P = 0.001)、咳嗽严重程度(P < 0.001)、面部 grimace 评分(P < 0.001)、操作过程中的不适感分级(P < 0.001)和操作过程回忆量表(P = 0.038)明显更好/更低。B组的血流动力学参数更好,在逆行插管期间显示出显著差异。然而,两组之间的插管难易程度量表、插管时间和并发症无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
逆行插管易于学习且并发症极少。静脉注射剂量为(1.5μg/kg)的右美托咪定对于逆行插管是最佳且安全的,其副作用在临床可控制范围内。