Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F, Theorell T, Reuterwall C, Ahlbom A
Department of Public Health Sciences at Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jun;46(11):1405-15. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)10084-3.
The objectives are to examine if the excess risk of myocardial infarction from exposure to job strain is due to interaction between high demands and low control and to analyse what role such an interaction has regarding socioeconomic differences in risk of myocardial infarction. The material is a population-based case-referent study having incident first events of myocardial infarction as outcome (SHEEP: Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program). The analysis is restricted to males 45-64 yr of age with a more detailed analysis confined to those still working at inclusion. In total, 1047 cases and 1450 referents were included in the analysis. Exposure categories of job strain were formed from self reported questionnaire information. The results show that high demands and low decision latitude interact with a synergy index of 7.5 (95% C.I.: 1.8-30.6) providing empirical support for the core mechanism of the job strain model. Manual workers are more susceptible when exposed to job strain and its components and this increased susceptibility explains about 25-50% of the relative excess risk among manual workers. Low decision latitude may also, as a causal link, explain about 30% of the socioeconomic difference in risk of myocardial infarction. The distinction between the interaction and the causal link mechanisms identifies new etiologic questions and intervention alternatives. The specific causes of the increased susceptibility among manual workers to job strain and its components seem to be an interesting and important research question.
研究目的是检验因工作压力导致的心肌梗死额外风险是否源于高要求与低控制之间的相互作用,并分析这种相互作用在心肌梗死风险的社会经济差异方面所起的作用。研究材料是一项基于人群的病例对照研究,以首次发生心肌梗死事件作为研究结果(斯德哥尔摩心脏流行病学项目:SHEEP)。分析仅限于45 - 64岁的男性,更详细的分析则局限于纳入研究时仍在工作的人群。分析共纳入了1047例病例和1450名对照。工作压力的暴露类别根据自我报告的问卷信息形成。结果显示,高要求和低决策自由度相互作用,协同指数为7.5(95%置信区间:1.8 - 30.6),为工作压力模型的核心机制提供了实证支持。体力劳动者在面临工作压力及其各组成部分时更易受到影响,这种易感性增加解释了体力劳动者中相对额外风险的约25% - 50%。低决策自由度作为一种因果联系,也可能解释了心肌梗死风险社会经济差异的约30%。相互作用机制与因果联系机制之间的区别提出了新的病因学问题和干预方案。体力劳动者对工作压力及其组成部分易感性增加的具体原因似乎是一个有趣且重要的研究问题。