Suppr超能文献

施氏葡萄球菌伤口感染暴发:通过随机扩增多态性DNA分析、PCR核糖体分型、传统核糖体分型和脉冲场凝胶电泳进行菌株鉴定

Outbreak of Staphylococcus schleiferi wound infections: strain characterization by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, PCR ribotyping, conventional ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

作者信息

Kluytmans J, Berg H, Steegh P, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, van Belkum A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ignatius Hospital Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Aug;36(8):2214-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.8.2214-2219.1998.

Abstract

Within a 1-year period, six surgical-site infections (SSI) caused by Staphylococcus schleiferi were observed in the department of cardiac surgery of Ignatius Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. Since outbreaks caused by this species of coagulase-negative staphylococci have not been described before, an extensive environmental survey and a case control study were performed in combination with molecular typing of the causative microorganism in order to identify potential sources of infection. Variability, as detected by four different genotyping methods (random amplification of polymorphic DNA [RAPD], conventional and PCR-mediated ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] of DNA macro restriction fragments), appeared to be limited both among the clinical isolates and among several control strains obtained from various unrelated sources. Among unrelated strains, RAPD and PCR-mediated ribotyping identified two types only, whereas seven different types were identified in a relatively concordant manner by conventional ribotyping and PFGE. The latter two procedures proved to be the most useful tools for tracking the epidemiology of S. schleiferi. Four of the outbreak-related strains were identical by both methods, and two isolates showed limited differences. In the search for a potential source of S. schleiferi infection, two slightly different PFGE types were encountered on several occasions in the nose of a single surgeon. These strains were, however, clearly different from the outbreak type. In contrast, S. schleiferi cultures remained negative for two persons identified on the basis of case control analysis. It was demonstrated that SSI caused by S. schleiferi had a clinical impact for patients comparable to that of a wound infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. This report describes the first well-documented outbreak of S. schleiferi infection. A source of the outbreak was not detected.

摘要

在1年时间内,荷兰布雷达伊格内修斯医院心脏外科观察到6例由施氏葡萄球菌引起的手术部位感染(SSI)。由于此前尚未有由这种凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌引起的暴发的相关描述,因此开展了广泛的环境调查和病例对照研究,并结合对致病微生物进行分子分型,以确定潜在的感染源。通过4种不同的基因分型方法(随机扩增多态性DNA[RAPD]、传统及PCR介导的核糖体分型,以及DNA大片段限制性内切酶片段的脉冲场凝胶电泳[PFGE])检测到的变异性,在临床分离株以及从各种无关来源获得的几种对照菌株中似乎都有限。在无关菌株中,RAPD和PCR介导的核糖体分型仅鉴定出两种类型,而传统核糖体分型和PFGE以相对一致的方式鉴定出7种不同类型。后两种方法被证明是追踪施氏葡萄球菌流行病学最有用的工具。两种方法鉴定出与暴发相关的4株菌株完全相同,另外两株分离株显示出有限的差异。在寻找施氏葡萄球菌感染的潜在来源时,在一名外科医生的鼻腔中多次发现两种略有不同的PFGE类型。然而,这些菌株与暴发类型明显不同。相比之下,根据病例对照分析确定的两个人的施氏葡萄球菌培养结果仍为阴性。结果表明,施氏葡萄球菌引起的手术部位感染对患者的临床影响与金黄色葡萄球菌引起的伤口感染相当。本报告描述了首例有充分记录的施氏葡萄球菌感染暴发。未检测到暴发源。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Isolation and genome sequencing of subspecies from Antarctic and North Sea seals.南极和北海海豹亚种的分离与基因组测序。
Access Microbiol. 2020 Aug 21;2(10):acmi000162. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000162. eCollection 2020.
7
Methicillin-Resistant Subspecies Infection in a Patient With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.一名肝细胞癌患者的耐甲氧西林亚种感染
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2016 Sep 26;4(3):2324709616671148. doi: 10.1177/2324709616671148. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

10
Comparison of four genotyping assays for epidemiological study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 May;13(5):420-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01972002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验