Haszprunar G
Zoologische Staatssammlung, Münchhausenstrasse 21, Munich, D-81247, Germany.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):333-9. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0496.
"Remane-Hennigian systematists" still reject parsimony analysis for phylogenetics, because homology or apomorphy analyses are not included. In contrast, "pattern cladists" regard homology as a deductive concept after applying a parsimony test of character congruence. However, as in molecular phylogeny, selection of "good" characters is always done on the basis of an a priori homology analysis. The distribution criterion of homology-"homologous characters have identical or hierarchical distribution"-is the basis of parsimony analysis. Because this criterion also might fail in cases of genealogical reticulation or concerted homoplasy, character congruence is not a strict test but another probabilistic criterion of homology. A synthetic approach is proposed for phenotypic analysis with application of a priori criteria of homology. The resulting a priori probabilities of homology serve as criteria for selection and weighting of characters (very low = not selected/poor/mediocre/good/Dollo characters). After application of a parsimony algorithm the final cladogram decides homology estimations.
“雷曼-亨尼吉安分类学家”仍然拒绝将简约分析用于系统发育学,因为其中未包含同源性或近裔共性分析。相比之下,“模式分支分类学家”在应用性状一致性的简约检验后,将同源性视为一个演绎概念。然而,如同在分子系统发育学中一样,“好”性状的选择总是基于先验的同源性分析进行。同源性的分布标准——“同源性状具有相同或层级分布”——是简约分析的基础。由于这一标准在谱系网状化或协同平行演化的情况下也可能失效,性状一致性并非严格检验,而是同源性的另一个概率标准。本文提出一种综合方法,用于运用同源性的先验标准进行表型分析。由此得出的同源性先验概率用作性状选择和加权的标准(概率极低 = 未被选择/差/中等/好/多洛性状)。在应用简约算法后,最终的分支图决定同源性估计。