Suppr超能文献

术后患者自控硬膜外使用阿片类药物与布比卡因的混合镇痛。

Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures.

作者信息

Ozalp G, Güner F, Kuru N, Kadiogullari N

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Ankara Oncology Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1998 Oct;45(10):938-42. doi: 10.1007/BF03012300.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia of morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief.

METHODS

Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied. After insertion of a lumbar epidural catheter, patients were given a non-opioid general anaesthetic. After surgery patients complaining of pain, received a loading dose of 2 mg morphine (Group I) or 50 micrograms fentanyl (Group II). For continuing pain, 1 mg morphine in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (0.25 mg.ml-1 morphine and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine, Group I) or 20 micrograms fentanyl in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine Group II) were administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 were monitored. Assessments of pain (VAS), nausea-vomiting, motor block, pruritus and sedation were recorded for 24 hr.

RESULTS

No difference in pain or sedation was observed between groups. The 24 hr postoperative opioid consumption was 15.50 +/- 7.53 mg morphine and 555.10 +/- 183.85 micrograms fentanyl. Total bupivacaine 0.125% consumption was 58.00 +/- 30.14 ml in Group I and 101.05 +/- 36.77 ml in Group II. One patient in Group II complained of motor weakness in one leg. The incidence of nausea (Group I 45%, Group II 10% P < 0.05) and pruritus (Group I 30%, Group II 5% P < 0.05) was less in patients receiving fentanyl.

CONCLUSION

Both methods were effective in the prevention of pain but, because of fewer side effects, fentanyl may be preferable to morphine.

摘要

目的

确定吗啡或芬太尼联合布比卡因患者自控硬膜外镇痛用于术后镇痛的有效性和安全性。

方法

研究40例计划行腹部大手术的ASA I-II级患者。插入腰段硬膜外导管后,患者接受非阿片类全身麻醉。术后诉疼痛的患者,给予负荷剂量的2mg吗啡(I组)或50μg芬太尼(II组)。对于持续性疼痛,给予4ml 0.125%布比卡因中含1mg吗啡(0.25mg/ml吗啡和1mg/ml布比卡因,I组)或4ml 0.125%布比卡因中含20μg芬太尼(5μg/ml芬太尼和1mg/ml布比卡因,II组)。监测血压、心率、呼吸频率和SpO2。记录24小时内的疼痛(视觉模拟评分法)、恶心呕吐、运动阻滞、瘙痒和镇静情况评估。

结果

两组间疼痛或镇静情况无差异。术后24小时阿片类药物消耗量为15.50±7.53mg吗啡和555.10±183.85μg芬太尼。I组0.125%布比卡因总消耗量为58.00±30.14ml,II组为101.05±36.77ml。II组1例患者诉单腿运动无力。接受芬太尼的患者恶心发生率(I组45%,II组10%,P<0.05)和瘙痒发生率(I组30%,II组5%,P<0.05)较低。

结论

两种方法均能有效预防疼痛,但由于副作用较少,芬太尼可能比吗啡更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验