• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉罩通气下非麻痹成年患者正压通气与自主通气的患者预后

Patient outcomes with positive pressure versus spontaneous ventilation in non-paralysed adults with the laryngeal mask.

作者信息

Keller C, Sparr H J, Luger T J, Brimacombe J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):564-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03012709.

DOI:10.1007/BF03012709
PMID:9669012
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare patient outcomes for positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV) in non-paralysed patients with the LMA using either isoflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty four adult patients were studied. Anaesthesia was with fentanyl/propofol and N2O 66% in O2 with 0.75 MAC isoflurane or sevoflurane and either PPV or SV. Positive pressure ventilation was with tidal volumes of 6-8 ml.kg-1. Peak airway pressures were < 15 cm H2O. Patients were evaluated for airway problems, cardiorespiratory effects, and anaesthesia emergence times.

RESULTS

There were no failed episodes of PPV or SV. Gastric insufflation was not detected by epigastric auscultation. Airway problems and cardiovascular effects were similar among groups. During maintenance: SpO2 was greater in the PPV group than in the SV group (98.4 vs 97%, P < 0.001); also, (PETCO2) (34 vs 43 mmHg) and the respiratory rate (RR) (15 vs 19 min-1) were higher and the minute ventilation (MV) (5.7 vs 7.2 L) were lower in the SV groups (P < 0.0001). Shorter times to LMA removal and orientation were observed in the sevoflurane groups (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient outcome is similar for SV and PPV in non-paralysed adult patients with the LMA. Isoflurane and sevoflurane at 0.75 MAC provide suitable conditions for maintenance and emergence, but emergence is more rapid with sevoflurane.

摘要

目的

比较在使用喉罩的非麻痹患者中,采用异氟烷或七氟烷麻醉时,正压通气(PPV)和自主通气(SV)对患者预后的影响。

方法

对164例成年患者进行研究。麻醉采用芬太尼/丙泊酚,66%氧化亚氮与氧气混合,吸入0.75最低肺泡有效浓度(MAC)的异氟烷或七氟烷,并采用PPV或SV。正压通气时潮气量为6 - 8 ml·kg⁻¹。气道峰压<15 cm H₂O。对患者的气道问题、心肺效应及麻醉苏醒时间进行评估。

结果

PPV或SV均无失败病例。上腹部听诊未检测到胃内充气。各组间气道问题和心血管效应相似。维持麻醉期间:PPV组的脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)高于SV组(98.4%对97%,P<0.001);此外,SV组的呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO₂)(34对43 mmHg)和呼吸频率(RR)(15对19次/分钟)较高,而分钟通气量(MV)(5.7对7.2 L)较低(P<0.0001)。七氟烷组喉罩拔除和定向时间较短(P<0.0001)。

结论

在使用喉罩的非麻痹成年患者中,SV和PPV的患者预后相似。0.75 MAC的异氟烷和七氟烷为维持麻醉和苏醒提供了合适的条件,但七氟烷麻醉苏醒更快。

相似文献

1
Patient outcomes with positive pressure versus spontaneous ventilation in non-paralysed adults with the laryngeal mask.喉罩通气下非麻痹成年患者正压通气与自主通气的患者预后
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):564-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03012709.
2
Decreased respiratory depression during emergence from anesthesia with sevoflurane/N2O than with sevoflurane alone.与单独使用七氟醚相比,七氟醚/一氧化二氮麻醉苏醒期间呼吸抑制减轻。
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Apr;46(4):335-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03013224.
3
Positive pressure ventilation with the size 5 laryngeal mask.使用5号喉罩进行正压通气。
J Clin Anesth. 1997 Mar;9(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00233-X.
4
Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual in-line neck stabilisation.在手动保持颈部直线固定期间,喉罩气道与喉管通气罩用于通气的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2006 Oct;47(10):892-6.
5
Propofol or sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion.用于喉罩置入的丙泊酚或七氟烷。
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Apr;46(4):322-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03013222.
6
Positive pressure ventilation with the laryngeal mask airway in non-paralysed patients: comparison of sevoflurane and propofol maintenance techniques.非麻痹患者使用喉罩气道进行正压通气:七氟醚与丙泊酚维持技术的比较
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Mar;80(3):332-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.3.332.
7
Potency and time course of mivacurium block during sevoflurane, isoflurane and intravenous anesthesia.七氟烷、异氟烷及静脉麻醉期间米库氯铵阻滞的效能和时程
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Jan;46(1):29-33. doi: 10.1007/BF03012510.
8
Pressure support ventilation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A comparison of sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol.使用食管-气管联合导管的压力支持通气。七氟烷、异氟烷和丙泊酚的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Aug;22(8):630-3. doi: 10.1017/s0265021505001055.
9
Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia.罗库溴铵在地氟烷、异氟烷和七氟烷麻醉期间的神经肌肉阻滞作用。
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):526-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03012702.
10
The A-line ARX index may be a more sensitive detector of arousal than the bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia: a preliminary investigation.在丙泊酚-芬太尼-氧化亚氮麻醉期间,A线ARX指数可能是比脑电双频指数更敏感的觉醒探测器:一项初步研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2004 Jun-Jul;51(6):539-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03018394.

引用本文的文献

1
Ventilation of Nonparalyzed Patients Under Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask Airway, Comparison of Three Modes of Ventilation: Volume Controlled Ventilation, Pressure Controlled Ventilation, and Pressure Controlled Ventilation-volume Guarantee.喉罩气道麻醉下非麻痹患者的通气:三种通气模式的比较:容量控制通气、压力控制通气和压力控制通气-容量保证
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):197-200. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200238.
2
Airway reactions and emergence times in general laryngeal mask airway anaesthesia: a meta-analysis.普通喉罩气道麻醉中的气道反应和苏醒时间:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):106-16. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000183.
3
LMA with positive pressure ventilation is safe!
喉罩通气并给予正压通气是安全的!
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;61(1):88-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.1.88. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
Spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients with a laryngeal mask airway: positive end-expiratory pressure does not improve oxygen saturation.使用喉罩气道的自主呼吸麻醉患者:呼气末正压通气不能改善氧饱和度。
Anaesthesist. 2010 Nov;59(11):1003-4, 1006-7. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1764-0. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
5
Airway management for postoperative respiratory failure: use of the laryngeal mask airway.术后呼吸衰竭的气道管理:喉罩气道的应用
Can J Anaesth. 2005 Apr;52(4):445-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03016299.