Suppr超能文献

在丙泊酚-芬太尼-氧化亚氮麻醉期间,A线ARX指数可能是比脑电双频指数更敏感的觉醒探测器:一项初步研究。

The A-line ARX index may be a more sensitive detector of arousal than the bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia: a preliminary investigation.

作者信息

Nishiyama Tomoki, Hanaoka Kazuo

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Tokyo, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2004 Jun-Jul;51(6):539-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03018394.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare changes in the A-line ARX index (AAI) by the Alaris AEP monitor(TM) with those of the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

METHODS

Eighty female patients undergoing partial mastectomy were randomly allocated to AAI or BIS (40 per group). Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg x kg(-1) and fentanyl 3 micro g x kg(-1) during the inhalation of oxygen. A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) #3 was inserted. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol 4 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1), fentanyl 1 micro g x kg(-1) given at the start of surgery, and nitrous oxide 4 L x min(-1) in oxygen 2 L x min(-1). Blood pressure, heart rate, and AAI or BIS were monitored, including recovery time of the index after disturbance by electrocautery.

RESULTS

The AAI but not the BIS increased significantly with LMA insertion and skin incision, while blood pressure and heart rate did not change. The BIS decreased from 87 +/- 7 to 30-60 while the AAI decreased from 75 +/- 8 to 10-25 during anesthesia. The increase of the AAI was larger than that of the BIS at recovery from anesthesia. The variation of the index was smaller in the AAI than in the BIS. Recovery time of the index after electrocautery was significantly longer in the BIS group (21 +/- 9 sec) than that in the AAI group (5 +/- 3 sec).

CONCLUSIONS

During propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia, the AAI responded to LMA insertion or surgical incision, but not the BIS, and the AAI had smaller variations. The AAI recovered faster from the disturbance by electrocautery than the BIS. Thus, the AAI may be a more sensitive and useful detector of arousal than the BIS.

摘要

目的

比较在丙泊酚-芬太尼-氧化亚氮麻醉期间,Alaris AEP监护仪(商标名)的A线ARX指数(AAI)与脑电双频指数(BIS)的变化情况。

方法

80例行部分乳房切除术的女性患者被随机分为AAI组或BIS组(每组40例)。在吸氧过程中,用2mg/kg的丙泊酚和3μg/kg的芬太尼诱导麻醉。插入3号喉罩气道(LMA)。麻醉维持采用4mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹的丙泊酚、手术开始时给予1μg/kg的芬太尼以及在2L/min的氧气中4L/min的氧化亚氮。监测血压、心率以及AAI或BIS,包括电灼干扰后指数的恢复时间。

结果

插入LMA和皮肤切开时,AAI显著升高而BIS未升高,同时血压和心率无变化。麻醉期间,BIS从87±7降至30 - 60,而AAI从75±8降至10 - 25。麻醉恢复时AAI的升高幅度大于BIS。AAI指数的变化比BIS小。电灼后BIS组指数的恢复时间(21±9秒)显著长于AAI组(5±3秒)。

结论

在丙泊酚-芬太尼-氧化亚氮麻醉期间,AAI对插入LMA或手术切口有反应,而BIS无反应,且AAI变化较小。AAI从电灼干扰中恢复得比BIS快。因此,与BIS相比,AAI可能是一种更敏感、更有用的觉醒监测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验