Kvale G, Berg E, Raadal M
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1998 Apr;56(2):105-9. doi: 10.1080/00016359850136076.
The purpose of this study was to test the ability of Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) and Spielberger's State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) to distinguish between fearful (n = 145) and regularly attending (n = 156) Norwegian dental patients. The reliability of both instruments was high (Cronbach's alpha indices > 0.95). With DAS, 90% of the fearful patients and 85% of the reference patients were correctly assigned to their appropriate group. Thus it may be concluded that, when used on a Norwegian population, DAS is a valid instrument for distinguishing fearful patients from those regularly attending dental treatment. The corresponding figures for STAI-S were 80% for the fearful patients and 79% for the reference patients. Although not developed specifically for this purpose, this instrument may therefore still validly be used to distinguish between the groups. The correlation between the instruments was 0.76, indicating that to some extent they measure the same phenomenon.
本研究的目的是测试科拉牙科焦虑量表(DAS)和斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑量表(STAI-S)区分挪威恐惧牙科患者(n = 145)和定期就诊牙科患者(n = 156)的能力。两种工具的信度都很高(克朗巴赫α系数> 0.95)。使用DAS时,90%的恐惧患者和85%的对照患者被正确归类到相应组。因此可以得出结论,在挪威人群中使用时,DAS是区分恐惧患者和定期接受牙科治疗患者的有效工具。STAI-S的相应数字是恐惧患者为80%,对照患者为79%。因此,尽管该工具并非专门为此目的开发,但仍可有效地用于区分两组。两种工具之间的相关性为0.76,表明它们在一定程度上测量的是同一现象。